WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

The cost of Housing is one of the most significant cost increases that is stifling young families today.

Even with good dual income, no debt, frugal habits, low-end cars, and willingness to commute a long ways, housing is STILL unaffordable for most young couples.

Everyone I know who owns a home either had financial help, bought deed restricted, or moved to an undesirable part of the country with fewer job prospects.

Each of those options have their own problems and are not really 'solutions.'

My simplistic understanding is cost increases when demand outstrips supply. However, what is different about today vs 50 or 100 years ago? Did we not have an expanding population back then? Were materials and skilled labor not rare commodities??

Who are buying all these houses if they're so unaffordable?

On everyone is circlejerking on how government intervention is the only way. "Government intervention, government-built housing, tax second home owners, etc."

I'm surprised that few people have come up with any alternate resolutions to the issue. I wonder if the issue will correct itself? You tell me.

What can we do to fix this situation?

The cost of Housing is one of the most significant cost increases that is stifling young families today. Even with good dual income, no debt, frugal habits, low-end cars, and willingness to commute a long ways, housing is STILL unaffordable for most young couples. Everyone I know who owns a home either had financial help, bought deed restricted, or moved to an undesirable part of the country with fewer job prospects. Each of those options have their own problems and are not really 'solutions.' My simplistic understanding is cost increases when demand outstrips supply. However, what is different about today vs 50 or 100 years ago? Did we not have an expanding population back then? Were materials and skilled labor not rare commodities?? Who are buying all these houses if they're so unaffordable? On [this reddit thread](https://old.reddit.com/r/ontario/comments/lxlwgf/how_in_the_f_are_young_couple_supposed_to_buy_a/) everyone is circlejerking on how government intervention is the only way. "*Government intervention, government-built housing, tax second home owners, etc.*" I'm surprised that few people have come up with any alternate resolutions to the issue. I wonder if the issue will correct itself? You tell me. What can we do to fix this situation?

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Young American families used to live in tar paper shacks and dugouts. No education, no welfare, no shoes.

As bad as things are now, they are nothing compared to the old days.

Real housing has always been in short supply. There is nothing new about that.

What is new today is people are not nearly as tough as they used to be.

Any reasonably enterprising person can do wonders with a regular welfare check.

Imagine starting out with no money at all. That was the usual starting point in the past.

You start with labor, and then savings, and charity, and build up from there.

Same as it ever was.

The whole point is it is supposed to be hard. That's the part that makes you into a decent hard working person.

Improvise, adapt, and overcome. Your ancestors did.

The worthy lift themselves out of the chaos. It's sink or swim.

When it all becomes too easy then the population turns into shit.

Shallow vain stupid helpless drug addicted hypocrites, whining about their gibs, incapable of simply providing for themselves, never mind others.

The fall of civilization. The power goes off and everybody dies like the frozen idiots they now are.

To keep the civilization, it needs to be hard. The left pushes welfare to create dependency, because their true purpose is to destroy.

The first question you need to answer is, is the issue really an issue?