If he was "against the vax" he'd have stopped her when she asserted the "vaccine" is 'incredibly life saving.' They often backtrack on minor things, or counter signal the extremely ridiculous things, it's only an indication in a change of approach or target. He's only stating what they can't deny, it's a neutral stance really.
If he was "against the vax" he'd have stopped her when she asserted the "vaccine" is 'incredibly life saving.'
They often backtrack on minor things, or counter signal the extremely ridiculous things, it's only an indication in a change of approach or target.
He's only stating what they can't deny, it's a neutral stance really.
(post is archived)