WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

181

Chemical warfare

Chemical warfare

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

It was interesting to see the chemical plant employees cleaning up dead fish instead of taking water samples.

[–] 1 pt

Um why are all the reports in a circle along an invisible edge? Seems like animals closest to the spill should be most effected.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Because geopolitically speaking, everyone is tied to a centre, which is usually the nearest town. I suspect each of these places are county council seats. So every town pin point not only covers the town, but the outskirts within its influence.

[–] 1 pt

OK well what's more is the circle is massively larger than the effected area as shown here. (i.dailymail.co.uk)

[–] 0 pt

I don't trust that graphic, it is very conservative.

[–] 1 pt

I thought the chems were blowing east and also into the Ohio River.

[–] 1 pt

Most of the chemicals in the air are indeed blowing east on prevailing winds. A certain portion of debris in any event like that will naturally go elsewhere. For example, if Yellowstone would erupt, a portion of the ash cloud would hit California.

[–] 0 pt

I would expect that but Lorain Ohio is significantly west of the area impacted. I might have to drive out there and look for myself.

[–] 3 pts

I might have to drive out there and look for myself.

That's a mighty risky thing to do, brother.

South if there had the Teflon leakage. It is beautiful country fucked over.

[–] 0 pt

Did you create this from news reports?