How many of those suicides were from people who were so badly maimed they didn't see any reason to go on living? One of the problems with determining the "cost" of a given military excursions based on troop deaths is that injuries have become substantially more survivable. Nothing quite like using a perfluorocarbon as blood plasma even existed even a few decades ago.

The obvious solution is to ban people from posting "KYS" on the internet.

How does this compare to the same number of people over that time period who weren't in the military? The sample size matters. This data might just be showing how safe military operations are compared to the general suicide rate.

Yes, but who won the war?

Well then dont join the military and go running doing whatever the kikes tell you too... easy solution there.

That is very sad. I’m sure that number will rise once we fill it with trannies.

Did this happen after any other wars? Vietnam, Korea, WWII?