Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

1.1K

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (45).
[–] • 5 pts

How do we know that this election was legit?

I don't trust elections anymore.

[–] • 7 pts

Democracy experts said these referendums are the most secure elections in history. That's good enough for me. Questioning the integrity of elections is an attack on our Democracy values.

[–] • 1 pt

I had a very good laugh at your comment. Thanks for the clever take.

[–] • 6 pts (edited )

Because if you look at the historical support of Russia it makes sense. Only a very small region has issues with Russia. Lets take stalk on that Region. Colluded with the democrats Funnels money to Hunter and the "Big Guy" Bombed Donbass - A Ukrainian city. Lied to impeach Trump Location of US Labs Every offspring from a democrat politician has some connection to that region.

Edit: I forgot. Its filled with faggots and trannies. Including the leader is a take it in the ass, penis licker.

[–] • 2 pts

Take Crimea Referendum, for example. Forbes, who is a slight-right-leaning news sight, wrote up a detailed article why that referendum was likely not legit:

https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.forbes.com%2Fsites%2Fdavidadesnik%2F2014%2F03%2F18%2Fhow-russia-rigged-crimean-referendum%2F%3Fsh%3D790eeddc6d41

I will say that based on the numbers, it is possible that a majority would have voted to rejoin Russia, regardless of the shenanigans Russia pulled. However, that suggestion is baseless on my part.

I don't trust any of these elections.

[–] • 2 pts

Forbes leans right... but I'm an establishment way.

We don't have any way of knowing if the votes were legit.

But we do know Eur/US/NATO has no interest in peace or "democracy." They could have negotiated along the lines of "Since the violence started in Donbas following a 2014 un-democratic coup that triggered place wasting to breakoff...we will have a ceasefire and set up credible mutually monitored votes from both sides for Donbas to self determine."

Instead they called them fake from the get go and never considered peace options.

The votes didn't prove the territories wanted to leave Ukraine or join Russia. But they proved US and minions have no interest in peace our "democracy."

[–] • 0 pt

...regardless of the shenanigans Russia pulled.

What does that even mean? Ukraine is Russian territory, cleaved from Russia by judaism. As what happened to Germany with the (((treaty of Versailles))).

[–] [deleted] • 4 pts

Or the pharmaceutical industry

[–] • 0 pt

Eh, truth.

But could we ever really trust the pharmaceutical industry? They were doing some shady shit even before most of us were born.

[–] • 0 pt

I believe it. It was 99% for unification, but that should be suspected since anybody that wouldnt want to leave ukraine simply wouldnt vote. Everyone that wanted to leave voted. There was 80% attendance though, which then indicates that a conservative estimate is that roughly 79% want to rejoin russia. The rest could have been against or simply could have not made it to vote.

I dont think its hard to believe the heavily racial russian regions would want to leave the jewish cesspit that is the kiev controlled ukraine after outlawing their language and murdering them over and over the past 8 years. The US forbid international observers because they knew it would be legit, at least a hell of a lot more legit than american elections.

[–] • 0 pt

There was 80% attendance though, which then indicates that a conservative estimate is that roughly 79% want to rejoin russia. The rest could have been against or simply could have not made it to vote.

Thanks for these numbers. That does help put things into perspective using real data. So it WAS legit and NATO wanted to keep the war going?

[–] • 1 pt

So it WAS legit...

Irrelevant, Russian land.

and NATO wanted to keep the war going?

NATO started the brother war to genocide Whites. So yes.

[–] • 0 pt

Of course they want this war going. They think they will win a war of attrition with Russia and were deluded into thinking they held all the cards. Russia has trading partners outside the west, they have massive supplies of oil and large tracts of land for food (even if its not the best land) Nato overplayed their hand hard, they expected their propaganda to be much more effective but at this point i think they are going to be more concerned over civil war than a hot war with a superpower. They expected their weapons in ukraine to inflict crippling losses at the cost of ukrainian lives, something jews have no problem spending. They werent as effective as they thought though. their arrogance is undermining them immensely.

If you are new to this conflict it started 8 years ago when us backed groups overthrew the ukrainian govt. its been going on for a while

[–] • 0 pt

Haha, they only sent ballots to people with Russian passports and there's photos of them counting blank ballots. Most areas probably would've voted to break away anyway but, like most elections these days, you can't trust the published results.