In the USA, we set a precedent (Flowers v. Mississippi, 2019) that if a nigger is convicted, then the conviction is not valid unless there were enough niggers on the jury.
How long before our "Conservative" SCOTUS similarly makes it so that a jury containing men cannot convict a wahmen?
In the USA, we set a precedent (*Flowers v. Mississippi*, 2019) that if a nigger is convicted, then the conviction is not valid unless there were enough niggers on the jury.
How long before our "Conservative" SCOTUS similarly makes it so that a jury containing men cannot convict a wahmen?
(post is archived)