Masculinity isn't what I'm challenging, but the fetishization of things people seem to largely misunderstand.
I've been critical of Daily Stormer before, but, admittedly, I think I may be a little too harsh at times, mainly due to my ignorance of their platform. Still, I get super paranoid when people start doing the whole Nazi LARP thing. Not because I think we should stray from our tribe. Believe me, I fully respect that because tribalism is simply inescapable. It's our nature.
With that being said, this is one of the very specific routes people take to discredit people like us who go on the internet and say things we shouldn't like bad goys.
Now, with all of that out of the way, I feel very compelled to avoid giving the 4th Reich any undeserved attention. If you guys all knew what Josef Mengele continues to do to this day, you might have a bigger appreciation for this.
Maybe I'm being dramatic, though. I mean, it's not unlike me, right?
NAZIs were members of the national socialist german workers' party between 1920 and 1945. They no longer exist. Same for their party, it no longer exists.
Anyone claiming to be a nazi is either misguided or larping. Now being a neo nazi, while often ideologically very close or "close enough", is an entire different thing
Neo nazis http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-HSVHrrMK-CQ/VpkfjbUCAYI/AAAAAAABtKM/J6ormsfGKuI/s1600/neo-nazis.jpg
Other neo nazis https://mmabbasi.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/members-of-tsagaan-khass-048.jpg
>Women membership The National Socialist Women's League was the women's organisation of the party and by 1938 it had approximately 2 million members. Membership outside Germany Party members who lived outside Germany were pooled into the Auslands-Organisation (NSDAP/AO, "Foreign Organization"). The organisation was limited only to so-called "Imperial Germans"; and "Ethnic Germans" (Volksdeutsche), who did not hold German citizenship were not permitted to join. Under Beneš decree No. 16/1945 Coll., in case of citizens of Czechoslovakia membership of the Nazi Party was punishable by between five and twenty years of imprisonment.
A lot of conditions had to be met to be a "nazi", it wasn't exactly an international social club open to everybody
...
That being said I believe I teach you nothing on this one, this is just to underline how right you are to be wary of anybody claiming to be a nazi
No such thing
Now, being a neo nazi, ok, but again what are we talking about? I believe I don't need to digress any further, you get the idea. Gas the kikes race war now is fun and all until it turns to mere mindless spam
...
Anglin isn't dumb, he digs stuffs on his own and writes down his thoughts in his journal, that's all what matters to me, the idea, the reasoning, the perspective. Not who said what. Who said what has its importance when it comes to context, and that's about it.
This: "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children" is a reasonable statement to say the least, it's true we have to do something about it regardless of our ideological preference. Anyone having a problem with that statement is part of the problem.
Now in front of a bunch of normies, especially if you attach the author's ideology to it, it's a catastrophe. Context matters. That being said, the general concept is good for all people. Everybody agrees. Example "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for jewish children". Turned like that you'll find exactly zero jew disagreeing with it. Another example "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for african children". You'll find precisely zero african disagreeing with that. And on and on and on.
One of the most universal cause in the end, one of the most human concept, (because after all if you don't stand for this what are you going to stand for?) came straight out of the mind of a white supremacist, a man running on one of the most exclusionary ideology
A similar parallel could somehow be drawn between judaism (exclusive) and christianism (inclusive)
The idea, the information, the message, that's what matters. The messenger is secondary, even huffpo can come up with interesting stuffs https://www.huffpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-and-the-s_b_9231190 "Hillary Clinton and the Syrian Bloodbath"
Exactly. I can't really argue with these things, but I'm always cautious of people getting too caught up on identity politics.
It's like - I think it has its place, but it's too often a favorite tool of people purposefully dividing. Which, frankly, is often done solely to control people.
If you guys all knew what Josef Mengele continues to do to this day
I have heard that he's working with the Rockefeller's and his family members are lifetime "actors" in various news psyops. What else did you hear?
(post is archived)