CIA has banned energy from water sources.They have the lock down on that tech, and at the same time you can visit black light power and see working models that they're trying to build into a distribution model that could replace oil. Trenton NJ.
https://brilliantlightpower.com/validation-reports/
Simple review says this has nothing to do with OP. And some checking says there is much pushback on their claims. Worse yet, there seems to be little in the way of specific claims of their technology. Which is a huge red flag in of itself.
https://www.youtube.com/user/BlackLightPowerInc
Here in their latest video we can see something but not really clear what it is we're seeing. And there is no shared data to hope to understand the event.
Convince me of something here. But for now, it smells of snake. Don't pull that glownigger bullshit on me. I'm more than happy to look at it. For example, LENR is very real. But that doesn't mean snakeoil is real.
Well, the laboratory is real. See the equipment list? Several hundred million in gear.. Scam?
Dr. Mills is a Certifiable genius as well. He WAS a medical doctor. Now hes a physicist. See the book he wrote? Bridging classical and quantum physics.. Two college reviews verifying his work with proton spin.
They don't put anything out to arouse your interest. They don't want funding. I'm telling you what they are. Primarily a research front for a science no other institute in the world is conducting, directly traceable back to Stanleys silly car that ran ran on water.
Ok. I'll look a little deeper.
Ty.
This is certainly not such a technology. This requires more energy than you will ever get back out. Utility in this type of technology is for things like plasma cutters without requiring gas storage tanks. You simply create what you need as you need it.
I followed that 'conspiracy' for two decades.
Stanley Meyer -> The Canadian co that bought the patents -> Sued by shareholders. SHAREHOLDERS BOUGHT OUT. Principals ened up with govt jobs in Canada.
Main research center is Black light power, CIA, trenton NJ.
Theyre called brilliant power or some such shit nowadays. The board of directors is all placeholders. The original board was GE chair, Rothchilds and some rear admirals among others.
Its a half a billion dollar facility. Check it out.
Me too, and I have an even better one for you. Prohibition was there to prevent the idea of hemp alcohol powered cars from spreading. Virtually any biomass, everything you see green around you can be converted into alcohol, i.e. E100 fuel popular in Brazil. In some cars (Koenigsegg, Flexfuel Volvos and Subarus in European markets) E85 can be used, which is ethyl alcohol with 15% addition of gasoline to improve starting at low temperatures. The product of burning pure alcohol is also hydrogen and oxygen in the form of pure water vapor. As you can see, we don't need electric cars with 600kg battery or even high pressure hydrogen tanks and HHO generators. It is enough for everyone to have a small distillery in the basement. On an industrial scale, the production of alcohol from synthesis gas is the cheapest, which is cheaper than drinking water treatment.
Yeah, but having the tech as DIY'able kinda prevents the big industry from going straight for murder. Folks trying to SELL the stuff, they've met some bad ends
Whatever his technology, this is absolutely not it. If you have balls bigger than your brain and a couple of bucks you can easily verify for yourself.
I'll say it again since some seem to not understand remedial science. This is certainly not such a technology. This requires more energy than you will ever get back out. Utility in this type of technology is for things like plasma cutters without requiring gas storage tanks. You simply create what you need as you need it.
This is the glow nigger argument. There are losses in any energy transformation process. In transport, there is no problem with obtaining energy and the problem with its condensed storage.
If you make make a comment which isn't low IQ and retarded, I'll happily discuss. As is, you've only established you are low IQ and potentially retarded. My statement is well grounded and fact based. Yours is strictly based upon retardation.
The choice is yours.
(post is archived)