Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.0K

Against unarmed adversaries, a defender can resort to deadly force if a disparity of force exists. And a young auto mechanic with a concealed carry license did just that in Bucks County, PA days ago. The prosecutor there just cleared him of wrongdoing, citing the number of attackers, their size, and other disparity issues.

> Against unarmed adversaries, a defender can resort to deadly force if a disparity of force exists. And a young auto mechanic with a concealed carry license did just that in Bucks County, PA days ago. The prosecutor there just cleared him of wrongdoing, citing the number of attackers, their size, and other disparity issues.

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

"and cooperated fully with the investigation, including giving a video and audio recorded interview, allowing police to review his cellphone, and consenting to gunshot residue testing, photographing, having his clothing collected, providing a blood sample, and releasing his medical records." - he should have said only "I feared for my life and I want an attorney" then shut up.

[–] • 1 pt

Well, damn, they are all white. That's a surprise.

This is why it is essential that men be able to carry guns. Against four on one, the only outcome would be to be beaten unconscious or killed. A gun changes those odds. They didn't call it the equalizer for nothing.

[–] • 0 pt

Bucks County, PA is pretty heavily white, albeit a lot of it is what we called 'white trash' growing up.

[–] • 0 pt

Are you still in love with Dana?

[–] • 0 pt

He lived but at 5'6" what quality of life will he have?

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Mitchell should have been charged with two counts of manslaughter, since he was engaged in a felony activity in which two people were killed. Normally if a gang is robbing a bank and one of them is shot to death, his accomplices are charged with his death under existing case law. Any felony activity that results in a death should garner charges for that death for any active accomplices at the scene.

[–] • 0 pt

Against unarmed adversaries, a defender can resort to deadly force if a disparity of force exists...

Retarded (((ruling))) and wrong. If someone attacks me whether or not they're larger than me or smaller than me I have the right to use deadly force. Also if it were 4 niggers he'd be off to prison by now.