WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

199

This sort of thing makes me wonder. I'd probably do the same if someone did something like this to my mom, dad or children. Meting out retribution for violence done to one's family is proper, but should a killer be allowed to go free because he killed a killer?

Back in the '90's a woman got twenty years in prison for killing the man that raped her little boy. Is that justice? I think she did the right thing and she did not receive justice.

This sort of thing makes me wonder. I'd probably do the same if someone did something like this to my mom, dad or children. Meting out retribution for violence done to one's family is proper, but should a killer be allowed to go free because he killed a killer? Back in the '90's a woman got twenty years in prison for killing the man that raped her little boy. Is that justice? I think she did the right thing and she did not receive justice.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

The problem with vigilantism is low IQ idiots. If we lived in an orderly, homogeneous Aryan society or reasonable intellect and education, and we locked up degenerates to keep them out of the gene pool, this type of thing would be too rare to care about.

[–] 0 pt

Oh you mean like before civil rights. right.

[–] 0 pt

No conflict necessary. In this case no White humans were injured, only low-life beaners. It is possilbe that the "mother" was a coal-burnin taco-bender, based upon her non-spic first name.

[–] 1 pt

It's more to do with vigilantism than race. Is it right or acceptable to kill the person that kills your loved one.

[–] 0 pt

Yes it is "acceptable". For the Aryan Man, it is imperative -- even if the murderer is a White person.