They gloss over the fact that he also killed him, but the ass rape is the big story.
They gloss over the fact that he also killed him, but the ass rape is the big story.
But what happened first, the rape or the killing?
But what happened first, the rape or the killing?
If it was the killing then the charge would have been abuse of a corpse. Dunno what sort of charge that carries. Looked it up:
Misconduct with regard to a corpse
This offence is punishable by a maximum of two years imprisonment. Under the same provision, it is a crime for a person to, without reasonable excuse, improperly or indecently interfere with a dead human body or human remains, whether buried or not.
If it was the killing then the charge would have been abuse of a corpse. Dunno what sort of charge that carries. Looked it up:
>Misconduct with regard to a corpse
>This offence is punishable by a maximum of two years imprisonment. Under the same provision, it is a crime for a person to, without reasonable excuse, improperly or indecently interfere with a dead human body or human remains, whether buried or not.
(post is archived)