I told you faggots. Not that it (ivermectin) would sterilize you but that it was being maliciously pushed. Oh so cohencidentlaly after HCQ was memory-holed when people found out it caused liver failure. The funny thing is that ivermectin does too.
You're a dipshit and so are they, Ivermectin doesn't reduce fertility or sterilize anyone - else there would be no more livestock or African niggers. Yet another attempt to steer people towards vaccines.
Some of the comments make a good point though.
India and Africa take Ivermectin like it's candy and they do nothing but create more useless eaters by the minute. Maybe its only possibly toxic to White people?
I never thought of that
I'm open to this, but there is a huge question to resolve...
Would a cattle breeder use a fertility depressing drug on cattle to reduce fly infestation? The calculus of making the cows comfortable at the expense of fertility does not make sense here.
It may be a question of dosing and frequency, of course. I thought vax shedding was BS until someone measured it by period problems in heritage human ladies. So I'm not ready for an absolute statement yet.
The fact that this is widely used in Africa is a confirming data point in my opinion. African fertility seems to be a top objective for (((them.)))
If Ivermectin caused fertility issues, you would be able to see correlations with birth rates in countries based on the rate of consumption of Ivermectin. Many countries (not in the West) sell Ivermectin over the counter, it's readily available and commonly used to treat and prevent parasitic infections. There is a huge amount of available population level evidence regarding the effects of Ivermectin on fertility, none of it shows that Ivermectin harms fertility.
What is likely happening is the continued clandestine push against the use of Ivermectin because it is such a safe and effective drug, against many issues, not only parasitic infections, but an anti-viral and anti-cancer drug. The question you need to ask yourself is: who might want Ivermectin to be demonized. Are there any organizations who may stand to lose substantial amounts of money (billions if not trillions of dollars) in the event that the general public comes to accept that Ivermectin is safe to use and effective in a wide number of situations? Would these people stoop to the level of creating false propaganda to demonize a drug that directly competes with their expensive and side effect (though you could debate whether the side effects are really the intended effects, which are (at best) used to generate yet more demand for pharmaceuticals) heavy products.
The self proclaimed (((elites))) have been on a clear mission to destroy Western nations. If Ivermectin effected fertility, they would be mailing packages of it to every household, even forcing people to take it (maybe a "no 'mectin, no job" policy or similar).
The liver failure in HCQ was caused by the trial deliberately using close to fatal overdoses of the drug. This was a deliberate strategy to create a negative study. They murdered people to push their chosen drugs. In the Ivermectin cases, they generally under-dosed. This is because the safety profile of Ivermectin is so good that it's almost impossible to overdose on it (unless you do something silly like confuse micro-grams with milli-grams, and take 1000 times as much as you were supposed to. Try that with almost any drug, aspirin, paracetamol, etc). The designed to fail Ivermectin trials gave low doses, late in the disease progression to low risk groups who would likely not see any benefit anyway.
If you believe some random whore on tik-tok being re-tweated by some random faggot on X, you might be susceptible to propaganda. You cannot trust anyone in this (you should not even trust me, you need to look into things yourself), propaganda is being used in increasingly sophisticated ways (such as seemingly random content creators popping up to push a particular message, not directly, but through tangential attacks). They have got significantly smarter about this since the start of COVID when they falsely assumed that their control over MSM would allow them to control the message. The information war is heading into a guerilla phase, where people who may seem like allies, or independent sources of information will in fact be the enemy of truth in disguise.
My wife and I have had children and I've also recovered from a sickness very fast after taking it. I may be retarded but this is fake and gay. Over the counter in Brazil and they have no fertility problem either it seems. Fuck this retard and his "arbitraryly" thick stack of papers.
In Brazil they also put it on prescription after the vax came out which made it exponentially harder to get. Also know two women who had hysterectomies after the clot shot because their periods never stopped.
To say they pushed ivermectin is an even more retarded thing to say.
I need more proof
ivermectin is STILL not available in Europe
so, the video is a CIA or big pharma shill
Both. All these homos work together and should all be treated as one organization.
More proof that it is very easy to change defiant people's minds by using some (((authority))) who is on their side say something contrary to the beliefs you already invested in. This is how (((controlled opposition))) is used as a (((tool))) to program those who won't take the narrative.
No proof is offered here, but because the speech was crafted as "it's a trap to take the (((vaxx))) and another trap to take ivermectin" which makes defiant non-thinkers avoid both. It's programming. It's also tracking because they can see where and to whom you share this (((info))) with. You're helping to reinforce their intel network.
Horse shit. British guys spouting off online don't have the best credibility track record as of late.
I will change my mind if I can see reliable data to back up what he is saying, but his story does not fit. The people pushing Ivermectin were censored heavily. One person I follow had to make up make up silly nicknames for Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin to keep his YouTube videos from being deleted. Ivermectin was not pushed from the top, it was suppressed.
As others have pointed out here Ivermectin is one of the most widely used drugs in the world and has been for decades. If it caused infertility from occasional use we would have seen it long ago in people who take it regularly. In many countries people do routine Ivermectin treatments once or twice every year.
Sounds like horse shit without parasites to me
(post is archived)