WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

Could COVID-19 have originated from a fusion of rare infectious diseases rather than wildlife? A groundbreaking study using AI-driven max-logistic intelligence suggests exactly that.

A surprising new study suggests that COVID-19 may not have originated from bats or pangolins, but rather from a rare fusion of human diseases.

Using an advanced AI-driven approach called max-logistic intelligence, researchers identified genetic links between COVID-19 and two obscure infections—glanders and Sennetsu fever—potentially rewriting the narrative of how the virus emerged.

Unraveling the Origins of COVID-19 The origins of COVID-19 remain uncertain despite extensive research. A new study published in Advances in Biomarker Sciences and Technology (ABST) takes an AI-driven approach to analyze DNA methylation patterns at 865,859 CpG sites in blood samples from early COVID-19 patients.

Led by Zhengjun Zhang from the University of Wisconsin’s Department of Statistics, the study used max-logistic intelligence to identify strong genetic links. The findings suggest that COVID-19 may have resulted from the natural fusion of two rare infectious diseases — glanders and Sennetsu fever — combined with common human illnesses.

A Shift Away from Wildlife Origins This challenges the widely accepted belief that the virus originated in bats or pangolins, raising the possibility that previous studies placed too much emphasis on wildlife origins. . .

>Could COVID-19 have originated from a fusion of rare infectious diseases rather than wildlife? A groundbreaking study using AI-driven max-logistic intelligence suggests exactly that. >A surprising new study suggests that COVID-19 may not have originated from bats or pangolins, but rather from a rare fusion of human diseases. >Using an advanced AI-driven approach called max-logistic intelligence, researchers identified genetic links between COVID-19 and two obscure infections—glanders and Sennetsu fever—potentially rewriting the narrative of how the virus emerged. >Unraveling the Origins of COVID-19 The origins of COVID-19 remain uncertain despite extensive research. A new study published in Advances in Biomarker Sciences and Technology (ABST) takes an AI-driven approach to analyze DNA methylation patterns at 865,859 CpG sites in blood samples from early COVID-19 patients. >Led by Zhengjun Zhang from the University of Wisconsin’s Department of Statistics, the study used max-logistic intelligence to identify strong genetic links. The findings suggest that COVID-19 may have resulted from the natural fusion of two rare infectious diseases — glanders and Sennetsu fever — combined with common human illnesses. >A Shift Away from Wildlife Origins This challenges the widely accepted belief that the virus originated in bats or pangolins, raising the possibility that previous studies placed too much emphasis on wildlife origins. . . [Archive](https://archive.today/zdWma)

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

The only thing that went "wrong" in this plan was, I think, that the virus escaped from the lab before they were "ready". The plan was to have a much more virulent virus, one that would actually have a mortality rate of 3-10%.

There’s 2 possibilities.

  1. It couldn’t be done or couldn’t be done in the timeline they wanted so they lied and that also goes back to you “demoralization” option.

  2. It was a lot more potent in the lab but failed in the real world and they had to go with it.