WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

833

Says they think the cancers are because of the virus. Although they can’t rule out the vax. Since a cold virus is also a corona virus why don’t we all have cancer since we’ve all had a cold?

Says they think the cancers are because of the virus. Although they can’t rule out the vax. Since a cold virus is also a corona virus why don’t we all have cancer since we’ve all had a cold?

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Stop doing your own research. That is a danger to (((our democracy))) (control). Just another "Just wait a year or two and that title is going to be revised".

[–] 0 pt

I know firsthand two boosted folk with rare cancers right now and two who died from turbo cancers within 3 months of their first jab.

[–] 0 pt

There are several mechanisms of oncogenicity from the "vaccine", from T-cell exhaustion to slippage in mRNA replication creating misfolded proteins and the existence of significant contamination in the jabs (e.g. SV40 sequences).

Cancer has been shooting through the fucking roof since the rollout. They know it, it was a part of the bioweapon design (in the disease itself, but more so in the jabs).

Any doctor who is still baffled at this stage should (but probably won't) get the punishment they deserve. If your doctor so much as hints at a booster, I would get up and walk out. Find one with some sense if you can.

[–] 0 pt

They cannot definitively rule out the Covid vaccines as playing a role, but believe the evidence supporting the virus theory to be much stronger.

Yes, they can definitively rule out vaccines. Compare the outcomes of the vaccinated to the unvaccinated.

I guarantee if these things were only happening to the unvaccinated they would have done that long ago and we would be hearing it endlessly. The fact that they will not do that obvious comparison tells you all you need to know.