WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

967

. . Putting aside the merits for trial, what should be clear is that, if the underlying facts are proven, the university acted in an abusive and capricious manner. Faced with a dissenting faculty member, the school opted to seek her termination rather than defend its policies or allow a dialogue on these measures.

As a public university, the Maine legislature should take note of this case and the need to reinforce free speech protections in the system. The level of intolerance for opposing views alleged in this complaint is chilling. If these facts are proven, there were grounds for termination but it was not the termination of Professor Griffin.

>. . Putting aside the merits for trial, what should be clear is that, if the underlying facts are proven, the university acted in an abusive and capricious manner. Faced with a dissenting faculty member, the school opted to seek her termination rather than defend its policies or allow a dialogue on these measures. >As a public university, the Maine legislature should take note of this case and the need to reinforce free speech protections in the system. **The level of intolerance for opposing views alleged in this complaint is chilling. If these facts are proven, there were grounds for termination but it was not the termination of Professor Griffin.** [Source Article](https://jonathanturley.org/2023/08/31/southern-maine-professor-wins-critical-victory-in-free-speech-case/)

(post is archived)