I remember the first several weeks when msm phizzer and cdc were all still calling it 'experimental' in the public news reports and articles. That was enough for me to go nope right off the bat ...
as you should have. and to be fair calling it "experimental" was true, it was experimental and we can all understand that need for some type of potential solution in extraordinary times.... but to call it "100% safe and effective" (especially in light of the fizer exec admitting it was never even tested for stopping transmission) it should have never, ever been enforced and mandated at the threat of your health and livelihood.
i agree with the ppl calling for non-hyperbolic nuremburg 2.0 trials. this was a complete violation of individual sovereignty and they fucking knew they were lying. cvd was entirely about control, plain and simple. if we allow them to skate for this they will 100% do it again, but this time they have feedback from their test run so it'll be even more overarching.
Yep, i'm an ex intranvenous drug user and also took part in a cohort for a legitimate 'experimental' drug trial for Gilead . Did the entire clinical trial - Phase3 long term follow up 2 year, requiring triplicate signed informed consent etc / bloods every 3-6 weeks bla bla. So at a minimum i understood the utter lunancy of an experimental drug openly massed marketed to the public and completely without addressing the fact to the public it was still experimental and lacked any long term clinical study data (without even getting into the gaming of the study parameters) as an entirely new method of action.
Concur , Trials and tribunals - no immunity tho, those that testify for the prosecution face life in prison those who refuse get the chair.
the Scarecrow holding trials in the Dark Knight scene is coming to mind.
(post is archived)