Pharmacists are not saying anything because there are no consequences.
>Pharmacists are not saying anything because there are no consequences.
Or maybe because there are consequences.
If the pharmacists were to suffer consequences for failing to provide informed consent, they would start providing information. The pfizer sheets for the shot are blank. No pharmacists are being sued and the drug companies have immunity.
>If the pharmacists were to suffer consequences for failing to provide informed consent, they would start providing information. The pfizer sheets for the shot are blank. No pharmacists are being sued and the drug companies have immunity.
If one shared the truth they would lose their jobs. Consequences work both ways. What you said is also true.
(post is archived)