I used to feel bad. I dont anymore. After being ridiculed and talked down to. Have at it is what i say
I used to feel bad. I dont anymore. After being ridiculed and talked down to. Have at it is what i say
I can imagine a lot. But I am somewhat impressed by the sheer number of distinct side effects that merit their own discrete titles. It's like the index to a medical textbook.
I can imagine a lot. But I am somewhat impressed by the sheer number of distinct side effects that merit their own discrete titles. It's like the index to a medical textbook.
Interesting comment:
Frances Scott 10 hr ago
I too was VERY alarmed when I saw those nine pages of AEs. Then I searched the heading term “Adverse Events of Special Interest,” & learned that is essentially a list of conditions for which the investigators will be LOOKING in the clinical trials, not what Pfizer had actually FOUND yet.
There ARE Adverse Events Pfizer lists with specific numbers & percentages. Those, I believe are AEs people who got the shots actually developed, according to post-market (data Pfizer collected after the shots got EUA & started being put in people).
Either way I trust this industry & our captured regulators less than EVER.
I knew better, based upon an 8-year informal investigation I conducted of Pharma practices, after two “99.9%” safe & effective Pharma products (hip replacement made by Johnson & Johnson wrecked my health, life & career as a local news anchor). Turns out the crap was causing cobalt toxicity, affecting my heart & brain. After 8.5 years of misery & research, I finally knew they were the cause of my worsening health, got them explanted, & got better (heart & brain at least).
To find out the truth, I had to go sit in on several people’s civil trials. You would not BELIEVE how fraudulently some of the “studies” had been conducted. That’s what began to open my eyes. Having been raised by an old-school surgeon who was a doctor just because he loved people (not as much for the $ rewards), it took me a long time to accept. In many cases the doctors don’t know the studies were conducted using fraud.
You are all wise to be skeptical. This industry does some good, but it does a ton of harm too & then lies to cover it up.
Glad you’re an Indy journalist too now, all of you!
Interesting comment:
>Frances Scott
10 hr ago
>
I too was VERY alarmed when I saw those nine pages of AEs. Then I searched the heading term “Adverse Events of Special Interest,” & learned that is essentially a list of conditions for which the investigators will be LOOKING in the clinical trials, not what Pfizer had actually FOUND yet.
>
There ARE Adverse Events Pfizer lists with specific numbers & percentages. Those, I believe are AEs people who got the shots actually developed, according to post-market (data Pfizer collected after the shots got EUA & started being put in people).
>
Either way I trust this industry & our captured regulators less than EVER.
>
I knew better, based upon an 8-year informal investigation I conducted of Pharma practices, after two “99.9%” safe & effective Pharma products (hip replacement made by Johnson & Johnson wrecked my health, life & career as a local news anchor). Turns out the crap was causing cobalt toxicity, affecting my heart & brain. After 8.5 years of misery & research, I finally knew they were the cause of my worsening health, got them explanted, & got better (heart & brain at least).
>
To find out the truth, I had to go sit in on several people’s civil trials. You would not BELIEVE how fraudulently some of the “studies” had been conducted. That’s what began to open my eyes. Having been raised by an old-school surgeon who was a doctor just because he loved people (not as much for the $ rewards), it took me a long time to accept. In many cases the doctors don’t know the studies were conducted using fraud.
>
You are all wise to be skeptical. This industry does some good, but it does a ton of harm too & then lies to cover it up.
>
Glad you’re an Indy journalist too now, all of you!
>
https://www.kvue.com/mobile/article/news/investigations/medical-device-dangers/fda-does-not-test-most-devices-implanted-in-humans-and-many-are-paying-for-it/269-c41ad14d-031f-4166-a18b-4361e8e22cfd
(post is archived)