![Russian Roulette [2048x947 - 109KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/mWeSCC.jpg){kind=link}
This appears to be the raw number of reports per lot, but it is meaningless if we don't know the size of each lot. If Lot A is twice as large as Lot B, it stands to reason that there would be twice as many reports for Lot A than Lot B.
This appears to be the raw number of reports per lot, but it is meaningless if we don't know the size of each lot. If Lot A is twice as large as Lot B, it stands to reason that there would be twice as many reports for Lot A than Lot B.
lot c is the politician version that has 0 adverse issues.
lot c is the politician version that has 0 adverse issues.
I had the same question. For what its worth they stated its bad per capita, although I don't have the numbers
I had the same question. For what its worth they stated its bad per capita, although I don't have the numbers
It says "Reports per lot." That's not per capita.
It says "Reports per lot." That's not per capita.
Stated elsewhere Not sure who made this chart
Stated elsewhere
Not sure who made this chart
Right, looks like the variation in lot size might even be 600:1!
Right, looks like the variation in lot size might even be 600:1!
(post is archived)