WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

I am Clinical Scientist in the chemistry department at a large Hospital Laboratory. When a person is suspected of having a heart attack, one of the ways to check is to run a Troponin test. The level/result is an indicator of damage to the heart. It’s normal to see a “positive result” for a middle aged person having a heart attack. But during the past six months I started getting 20 year olds having heart attacks. Then 13 year olds, now today for the first time in 20 years of doing this...an 8 year old boy having a full-on heart attack (no previous medical history of any kind) I’m sure that when they “approve” the vax for 2 year olds, they’ll have heart attacks as well. These heart attacks are not something that resolves over time. You cannot regenerate cardiac tissue. Once it’s damaged, it done.

I am Clinical Scientist in the chemistry department at a large Hospital Laboratory. When a person is suspected of having a heart attack, one of the ways to check is to run a Troponin test. The level/result is an indicator of damage to the heart. It’s normal to see a “positive result” for a middle aged person having a heart attack. But during the past six months I started getting 20 year olds having heart attacks. Then 13 year olds, now today for the first time in 20 years of doing this...an 8 year old boy having a full-on heart attack (no previous medical history of any kind) I’m sure that when they “approve” the vax for 2 year olds, they’ll have heart attacks as well. These heart attacks are not something that resolves over time. You cannot regenerate cardiac tissue. Once it’s damaged, it done.

(post is archived)

[–] 9 pts

Glad to see high caliber talent around here. Thanks for sharing.

[–] 1 pt

Is it possible to detect the damage before the heart attack occurs? Should vaccinated people visit a cardiologist? If a damage is detected, could they avoid the heart attack by taking medications for the rest of their lives?

[–] 5 pts

I predict that blood thinners will become the most frequently used drug when 100 million vaxxed people realize that they are at increased risk of stroke and heart attack. Fortunately Pfizer makes one of the leading ones, Eliquis.

Eliquis, up 13% operationally, led by growth in the U.S. and emerging markets, driven primarily by continued increased adoption in non-valvular atrial fibrillation and oral anti-coagulant market share gains;

[–] 4 pts

Doesn’t that seem awfully convenient?

[–] 1 pt

Xiden will get right on it.

Does China have mandatory jabs? I am just wondering who will formally invade in 10 years when the vaxed kids become of fighting age.

[–] 5 pts
  1. Yes. Immediate intervention at first sign of a problem. Ie chest pain, short of breath, jaw pain, left arm pain.

  2. Vaxxed people should at the very least be taking 81mg aspirin. Also a good idea to get a D-Dimer test. (this would tell you if you have the byproducts of blood clots in your system.

  3. If the heart attack has or is happening, the damage that has been done is permanent.

[–] 2 pts

I went for cardio checkup recently. Doc told me that if you think you are having a heart attack you can chew up and swallow an adult aspirin.

Of course he also has posters telling me to inject this shit, so who knows anymore.

Aspirin is a blood thinner. Stand by for it being declared too unsafe. Maybe a good old fashioned Tylenol scare for it.

[–] 0 pt

Very good to post this info. A coupla other pointers. A family member took aspirin, which saved their life. Medical care was not up to speed. Did not even get nitro. Quality of care varies. Consider distance, time, various factors. Often very definitive pre-hospital care can be administered enroute to the hospital via ambulance. Driving a loved one there yourself might delay crucial interventions. Note that denial is also considered a symptom. "This can't be happening to me." There can also be other signs/symptoms. Pale, diaphoretic. Anxiety. For ladies it can be masked as nausea not classic chest pain. "I just don't feel right." Nothin' to play with. Don't tough it out. Get the care you need. The risk of damage/death and possibly permanently changing one's game/quality of life, is too much to downplay. Certainly consider what lifestyle changes need to happen to IMPROVE your health. Keep moving. Look at folks around you who have not done this. Those are the folks i would run on (normally). Even if i ran on you a dozen times, i always took it seriously. It was my job to treat, not to downplay or ignore it. Dayum if COVID was not a gamechanger for me. Now heart rate goes down as low as 35. But i have been checked and still feel no ill effect. Tests done and i am still functioning like normal. Figure that. God is good.

[–] 0 pt

I'm thinking about the athletes who die like flies atm. They do their training and everything feels right - then suddenly it's too late. Maybe the vaccine induced a silent myocarditis that left some damage, but was not strong enough to cause symptoms. Could a cardiologist have warned them, or is the hidden damage caused by myocarditis undetectable?

[–] 2 pts

Yes. They could monitor blood tests such as CK, CKMB, and CRP. Those athletes are probably suffering from inflammation of the heart itself, or the lining of the pericardial sac causing the heart to struggle. If there is pain, there is damage. The benefits clearly do not outweigh the risks.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

You shouldn’t have got the shot to begin with . You were warned

[–] 2 pts (edited )

Pueblood with natural immunity here. I was warned in time (first Voat, then Poal).

Ok, so what's the life expectancy of these people suffering from all this heart damage?

[–] 3 pts

I hear 50% five year survival after myocarditis from McCollough. Working from memory here.

[–] 3 pts

Depends on how much damage is done prior to appropriate intervention. Too many variables.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

I know simply by looking at blood samples under microscope is impossible to create a diagnose, but may it be visible having clot formations?

I wanted to see myself the difference and bought one, already checked 2 vaxed and 3 unvaxed, the 2 vaxed had quite thin blood compared to unvaxeds, but under microscope it was full with stacked up red blood cells, they didn't even move in the plasma. I couldn't find any spot on the slide where the blood looked normal.

Two unvaxed had normal looking blood in the middle of the slide. The 5th unvaxed subject had weird blood, somewhere in between the other samples.

I'll check more people in the future and will compare, but a little help is needed to analyse the results.

I also will ask the vaxeds to take blood thinner and will check their blood again.

I don't know what I'm doing is any good.

Edit: If someone is interested then here are the pics (not having PS on this computer, so I just used mspaint to merge them).

https://pic8.co/sh/d6mNS0.png

I have to highlight that, while there is quite a difference on the pictures, I may have fucked up something, since I owned a microscope only for like 2 days when I made this images, so don't make a long shot.