The Jab is an experiment and the booster is to further the experiment. Likely, the 1st and second jab is a placebo in a large portion of the population. They search the data for effectiveness of whatever they are seeking to control or observe. Then the booster is given to enlarge the test group. If they give the real chemicals to the whole population at once, massive death will ensue. everyone will be coming for them that hasn't taken the vaccine. this will never end until they get the data and control that they seek. death is probably not the ideal outcome or they will have no one to pick the vegetables. the border jumpers are not required to get the vaccine for a reason. they are needed to pick the vegetables lest the elites starve to death. There is a virus they created to have the opportunity to put their plan into action. If you aren't with them, you are against them. They do not care about dying children. They abort millions of them every year. They are not compassionate. I opine they are seeking a solution to mortality. Many of them are getting to a ripe old age. They can't just quit their life's work of enslaving everyone.
The Jab is an experiment and the booster is to further the experiment. Likely, the 1st and second jab is a placebo in a large portion of the population. They search the data for effectiveness of whatever they are seeking to control or observe. Then the booster is given to enlarge the test group. If they give the real chemicals to the whole population at once, massive death will ensue. everyone will be coming for them that hasn't taken the vaccine. this will never end until they get the data and control that they seek. death is probably not the ideal outcome or they will have no one to pick the vegetables. the border jumpers are not required to get the vaccine for a reason. they are needed to pick the vegetables lest the elites starve to death.
There is a virus they created to have the opportunity to put their plan into action. If you aren't with them, you are against them. They do not care about dying children. They abort millions of them every year. They are not compassionate. I opine they are seeking a solution to mortality. Many of them are getting to a ripe old age. They can't just quit their life's work of enslaving everyone.
As long as these news remain in niche/conservative sites, nothing will happen. Sharing them here feels like we’re masturbating with each other. It’s gay.
As long as these news remain in niche/conservative sites, nothing will happen. Sharing them here feels like we’re masturbating with each other. It’s gay.
These statistics won't make any difference. The plan must continue.
These statistics won't make any difference. The plan must continue.
and it will go on until infants are covered too
and it will go on until infants are covered too
According to the ONS’ “five-year average weekly deaths by sex and age group” figures between 2015 and 2019 among children ages 10-14, there were 41 deaths recorded from week 38 (late September) to week 45 (early November). Within the same time period, the weekly figures recorded for the year 2021 show that 59 children died, representing a 43.9 percent rise in deaths over the five-year average.
Oh, they only looked at a snapshot in time instead of the entire year? And they didn't do a statistical power test (two-tailed) to determine if it was statistically significant?
Let's look at more data.
Look at 2020, we have the data:
282 deaths in that same age group. Vaccines didn't start rolling out until Jan and didn't really take off until April-May in the UK.
What is that same figure, year to date, for 2021? 232. We are significantly under death counts for 2021 for that same age group, for 2021.
And why did they select just 10-14? Why not all of teens? Why not 0-19? Why specifically 10-14?
Because these fucks are disinformation agents. Trying to lie to use to believe a specific narrative.
Why didn't they run their headline: "Deaths among 10-14 year olds are down 2% over the same time period in 2020."? Why wasn't that the headline? That's the honest headline. That's the actual facts.
Don't fall for this shit.
And if deaths have gone up, we have evidence that the Delta variant is deadlier than the Alpha variant: the two primary deadly variants of concern.
NB4 "kike/nigger/glowie/faggot/etc."
NB4 comments about being blind to the "real" facts.
No one is going to read this and change their mind. You won't even open the spreadsheets they reference in their article because you saw a headline that matched your bias and just went with that.
>According to the ONS’ “five-year average weekly deaths by sex and age group” figures between 2015 and 2019 among children ages 10-14, there were 41 deaths recorded from week 38 (late September) to week 45 (early November). Within the same time period, the weekly figures recorded for the year 2021 show that 59 children died, representing a 43.9 percent rise in deaths over the five-year average.
Oh, they only looked at a snapshot in time instead of the entire year? And they didn't do a statistical power test (two-tailed) to determine if it was statistically significant?
Let's look at more data.
Look at 2020, we have the data:
282 deaths in that same age group. Vaccines didn't start rolling out until Jan and didn't really take off until April-May in the UK.
https://www.ons.gov.uk/file?uri=%2fpeoplepopulationandcommunity%2fbirthsdeathsandmarriages%2fdeaths%2fdatasets%2fweeklyprovisionalfiguresondeathsregisteredinenglandandwales%2f2020/publishedweek532020.xlsx
What is that same figure, year to date, for 2021? 232. We are significantly under death counts for 2021 for that same age group, for 2021.
And why did they select just 10-14? Why not all of teens? Why not 0-19? Why specifically 10-14?
Because these fucks are disinformation agents. Trying to lie to use to believe a specific narrative.
Why didn't they run their headline: "Deaths among 10-14 year olds are down 2% over the same time period in 2020."? Why wasn't that the headline? That's the honest headline. That's the actual facts.
Don't fall for this shit.
And if deaths have gone up, we have evidence that the Delta variant is deadlier than the Alpha variant: the two primary deadly variants of concern.
NB4 "kike/nigger/glowie/faggot/etc."
NB4 comments about being blind to the "real" facts.
No one is going to read this and change their mind. You won't even open the spreadsheets they reference in their article because you saw a headline that matched your bias and just went with that.
Good points, but I won't open the spreadsheets because I'm afraid of a virus.
Good points, but I won't open the spreadsheets because I'm afraid of a virus.
The age group separation is because they just legalized vaccines for kids that young. The smaller month subset is for the same reason. Learn to read nigger.
The age group separation is because they just legalized vaccines for kids that young. The smaller month subset is for the same reason. Learn to read nigger.
The age group separation is because they just legalized vaccines for kids that young.
Study age range the article pointed out: 10-14
Actually what the UK said: 12-15.
Date those children were allowed to get the jab: September 20, 2021.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/sep/13/uk-children-aged-12-to-15-to-be-offered-covid-jab
The week's they used in the article: Weeks 38-45. Week 38 began September 20. And we are supposed to assume all children between 10-14 (not the new approved age range) are instantly all vaccinated and every death now counts towards vaccine-caused deaths?
The smaller month subset is for the same reason. Learn to read nigger.
This is a very ironic statement coming from you. Seems you didn't read anything about this topic at all. You got the age subset wrong, the timeframes wrong, and the vaccination rates wrong in order to take away the understanding that you did.
You didn't address my question and instead, cemented the reason these disinformation idiots keep writing false articles: so retards like you will eat it up to confirm your narratives.
Congratulations: you're a Chinese disinformation shill. Did you know you were a Chinese disinformation puppet?
>The age group separation is because they just legalized vaccines for kids that young.
Study age range the article pointed out: 10-14
Actually what the UK said: 12-15.
Date those children were allowed to get the jab: September 20, 2021.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/sep/14/uk-covid-vaccinations-for-children-aged-12-15-what-you-need-to-know
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/sep/13/uk-children-aged-12-to-15-to-be-offered-covid-jab
The week's they used in the article: Weeks 38-45. Week 38 began September 20. And we are supposed to assume all children between 10-14 (not the new approved age range) are instantly all vaccinated and every death now counts towards vaccine-caused deaths?
>The smaller month subset is for the same reason. Learn to read nigger.
This is a very ironic statement coming from you. Seems you didn't read anything about this topic at all. You got the age subset wrong, the timeframes wrong, and the vaccination rates wrong in order to take away the understanding that you did.
You didn't address my question and instead, cemented the reason these disinformation idiots keep writing false articles: so retards like you will eat it up to confirm your narratives.
Congratulations: you're a Chinese disinformation shill. Did you know you were a Chinese disinformation puppet?
Ok after looking at it some more I recant my statement about you being a nigger. I thought this was the same study as this one https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/11/10/deaths-among-male-children-have-risen-by-86-percent-since-offered-covid-vaccine/ but its not.
Youre right in questioning why the fuck they used a 10-14 age range.
However, on your other point about not every kid getting the vax yet, depending on how harmful what they are getting is we could expect to see deaths and other symptoms from just a small subset.
It sounds like they rolled out a school vax program to get the kids asap and they arent releasing the numbers because of a “blunder”. Estimates they did provide were at 10% as of the start of october. Thats around 350,000 kids. That would be a mortality rate of .000054 (19 excess deaths) which is roughly double what is reported, likely heavily underreported, in the uk overall (1200 deaths / 46m vaccinated). The numbers seem to be in the correct ballpark in regards to the claims.
Ok after looking at it some more I recant my statement about you being a nigger. I thought this was the same study as this one https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/11/10/deaths-among-male-children-have-risen-by-86-percent-since-offered-covid-vaccine/ but its not.
Youre right in questioning why the fuck they used a 10-14 age range.
However, on your other point about not every kid getting the vax yet, depending on how harmful what they are getting is we could expect to see deaths and other symptoms from just a small subset.
It sounds like they rolled out a school vax program to get the kids asap and they arent releasing the numbers because of a “blunder”. Estimates they did provide were at 10% as of the start of october. Thats around 350,000 kids. That would be a mortality rate of .000054 (19 excess deaths) which is roughly double what is reported, likely heavily underreported, in the uk overall (1200 deaths / 46m vaccinated). The numbers seem to be in the correct ballpark in regards to the claims.
I think they're trying for 90%, they better give them a booster.
I think they're trying for 90%, they better give them a booster.
Imagine my shocked face over this information we've known, for say, oh at least 2 years now.
Imagine my shocked face over this information we've known, for say, oh at least 2 years now.
(post is archived)