True that. But they counter it with their proven method to distract people from unwanted information: They insert red herrings into the discussion, making us crying wolf. This allows them to dismiss our arguments by using the straw man fallacy. The prion discussion is such a red herring.
Vaccine induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT) is acknowledged even by the vaccine proponents like The Lancet.
The VAERS underreporting factor is not known yet, but the argument by the vaccine proponents that it must be zero is losing ground. We have to make them admit that it is above zero, and that it is important to determine the real number.
above zero
Do you know what a URF even is?! ZERO is not a relevant number in the discussion. Perhaps you mean ONE?
If the URF == 1, then there are exactly as many events as reports. If the URF < 1, then that corresponds to an OVERreporting factor. Not happening.
Kirsch calculated the URF eight ways, and the smallest of them was 41x. To say that it is "not known" is weird when we have a conservative minimum value.
People will have to decide for themselves whether or not they're going to submit to the various "gubbermints" and take the clot shots.
(post is archived)