WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

538

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 4 pts

My understanding is that it takes years for prion diseases to show up. They develop slowly like over 5 years.

[–] 2 pts

That's why the claims that the rna shots have no long term effects are bunk. By the standards they're using, eating mad cow beef, breathing asbestos dust and rubbing radium on your face are all perfectly safe.

[–] 2 pts

Correct. All lies that take years to reveal.

Trust the lies science.

[–] 0 pt

The animal model indicates that the vaxxxed will be developing prion diseases in 18 months.

[–] 0 pt

Mr Classen has a lot of phantasy. But he avoids any possible explanation why vaccine mRNA or spike proteins could cause this, and virus RNA and spike proteins would not.

[–] 0 pt

I don't see that that's relevant given that the virus doesn't exist.

[–] 0 pt

Most supposed Covid patients have never had the virus.

[–] 0 pt

The prion rumor is based on one "paper" with the theory that zinc causes prions (if true, we should stop eating). They use a theory that cannot get disproved the next 5 years to spread some panic.

what panic are they trying to spread?

[–] 1 pt

We are in the middle of an information war, and the main objective of the controlled opposition is to throw us away from the cures - the cures would end the medical emergency and the vaccination drive. They have multiple strategies to do that: * "There is no virus" - and therefore no cures; * zinc causes prion disease *panic* => quercetin and HCQ are deadly; * drugs are dangerous chemicals (used against fluvoxamine treatment).

[–] 3 pts

There is just far too much negative information about the vaccines to risk getting vaxxed.

[–] 0 pt

True that. But they counter it with their proven method to distract people from unwanted information: They insert red herrings into the discussion, making us crying wolf. This allows them to dismiss our arguments by using the straw man fallacy. The prion discussion is such a red herring.

what is the smoking gun then?

[–] 0 pt

Vaccine induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT) is acknowledged even by the vaccine proponents like The Lancet.

The VAERS underreporting factor is not known yet, but the argument by the vaccine proponents that it must be zero is losing ground. We have to make them admit that it is above zero, and that it is important to determine the real number.

[–] 0 pt

People will have to decide for themselves whether or not they're going to submit to the various "gubbermints" and take the clot shots.