Nah, you’re just a different kind of NPC. Basically a “do the opposite of” kind of NPC without actually discerning what’s objectively verifiable or not. Start by actually reading the article and note that the author is a woman with the name Garcia. Should tip you off before you even start reading this diarrhea.
Nah, you’re just a different kind of NPC. Basically a “do the opposite of” kind of NPC without actually discerning what’s objectively verifiable or not. Start by actually reading the article and note that the author is a woman with the name Garcia. Should tip you off before you even start reading this diarrhea.
I didn't read the article. Why bother with something that's irrelevant? Pfizer doesn't need to be giving people AIDS to be worthy of distain. The sheer lack of scientific rigor in their jab endeavor is evidence enough of their malevolence.
I appreciate your elaboration. Gives more to digest than simply "No it doesn't."
I didn't read the article. Why bother with something that's irrelevant? Pfizer doesn't need to be giving people AIDS to be worthy of distain. The sheer lack of scientific rigor in their jab endeavor is evidence enough of their malevolence.
I appreciate your elaboration. Gives more to digest than simply "No it doesn't."
(post is archived)