I didn't read the article. Why bother with something that's irrelevant? Pfizer doesn't need to be giving people AIDS to be worthy of distain. The sheer lack of scientific rigor in their jab endeavor is evidence enough of their malevolence.
I appreciate your elaboration. Gives more to digest than simply "No it doesn't."
I didn't read the article. Why bother with something that's irrelevant? Pfizer doesn't need to be giving people AIDS to be worthy of distain. The sheer lack of scientific rigor in their jab endeavor is evidence enough of their malevolence.
I appreciate your elaboration. Gives more to digest than simply "No it doesn't."
(post is archived)