It's called Hobson's choice.
Here’s another one:
“Covid isn’t as deadly as we thought and can be treated with Ivermectin, HCQ, etc.”
vs
“Covid is a totally serious and deadly pandemic”
Another:
“Las Vegas was another tragic lone wolf white guy psycho who killed all those people”
vs
“Las Vegas was a ‘false flag’ with multiple shooters who were likely Saudi agents”
There are a lot of examples actually. You are allowed a choice of basically only two opinions, and it’s always either the faggot opinion or the cuck opinion. The predetermined boundaries of discussion are set by the people responsible for presenting the lies in media. The truth in my experience is nearly always somewhere else, and it’s usually the more “outrageous” proposition that is simply ridiculed and dismissed.
Covid isn’t real and Vegas was theater.
They all had covid in vegas, and 'Paddock' was just administering their shots.
The truth in my experience is nearly always somewhere else, and it’s usually the more “outrageous” proposition that is simply ridiculed and dismissed.
Doing that will just incline you to start believing every tinfoil idea out there.
IME the truth is usually the idea that is best explained by the largest amount of government employee ineptitude, laziness and self interest, coupled with "why would anyone bother to do anything more complicated?"
Just as niggers are best explained by centuries of obviously lazy and violent behaviour, along with self interested democrat exploitation of their avarice, and are not best explained by 'global systemic racism involving a hidden cabal of white oppressors conspiring to steal all those black inventions..."
And your included example, a white guy going nuts with some guns because 'murica & fuck everyone else, is far more likely than an overly elaborate yet pointless killing involving foreign state support and the football field of people required to cover it all up for a decade...
That’s why the truth about Las Vegas is that no one was shot. It’s much more believable that some and sounds of gunfire were used to prey on American’s susceptibility to the in order to make the public more amenable to gun control and more police state.
Of course you don’t just blindly believe the most outlandish sounding theory. You use Occam’s Razor, which most people grossly misunderstand, but depends on weighing all available evidence. In this case you look for evidence that anyone or anything actually got shot at Las Vegas….. then you realize there isn’t any.
I would have just called it a false dichotomy.
Word of the day.
(post is archived)