Maybe someone better at statistics than me can chime in, but if that’s the case, since the odds of dying from vaccine are guaranteed because you took it, and the odds of COVID are adjustable since you could do other preventable measures like vitamin d, zinc, ivermectin (all told 99%? Reduction) and the chance of never contracting it at all, doesn’t that make it much much worse odds than that?
Studies, statistics and polls by "official sources" stopped being of any use or value around the time Obama took office. The liberals lie. They lie all the time. All they do is lie. And all the organizations under their control lie along with them.
The [number needed to vaccinate]NNTV to prevent one death is between 9,000 and 50,000, with 16,000 as a point estimate ... the number of fatal side effects is 4.11 per 100,000 vaccinations
That seems to be where the number is coming from, so the NNTV is supposed to be taken from the population at large randomly. Therefore, it includes all common prevention strategies currently in place. However, if the government were to encourage vitamin d, zinc, etc then the NNTV would skew way up making the vaccine a totally unreasonable solution.
A bigger flaw in their numbers is that they don't account for age. The COVID deaths are mainly elderly people with co-morbidities confined to assisted living facilities, but the vaccine deaths seem to be distributed across the age spectrum. When real researchers attempt to find the cost of things (like a new highway safety project) they usually account for this. A 20 year old dying robs society of 40+ years of productive life. An elderly person in an assisted living facility robs society of a few years of largely unproductive life. Therefore, each vaccine death is probably equivalent to a dozen covid deaths.
(post is archived)