Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

630

>A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.

I know what that sounds like but I'm not going to say what I think it means until you say what you think it means.

Go to pg 67.

>8.3.5. Exposure During Pregnancy or Breastfeeding, and Occupational Exposure Exposure to the study intervention under study during pregnancy or breastfeeding and occupational exposure are reportable to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness.

>An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with the study intervention, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an AE

Unplanned? What is this study telling us anons?

>>A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception. I know what that sounds like but I'm not going to say what I think it means until you say what you think it means. [The Study](https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2020/11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020_Pfizer_BioNTech.pdf#page67) Go to pg 67. >>8.3.5. Exposure During Pregnancy or Breastfeeding, and Occupational Exposure Exposure to the study intervention under study during pregnancy or breastfeeding and occupational exposure are reportable to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness. >>An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with the study intervention, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an AE Unplanned? What is this study telling us anons?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (7).
[–] • 1 pt

I did not and I do not. I am blessed to have chosen a career where I work alone outdoors much of the time and I do my damndest to avoid prolonged close contact with the "vaccinated".

[–] • 0 pt

Deeper meaning behind my question. Those who consent to the vax cannot sue for damages. Unplanned exposure to study intervention is non-consent.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

You're right but good luck winning that case in the vaccine court. The kikes behind this trial run for the mark of the beast will never acknowledge the damages their contagion causes nor will they admit the true purpose of all their research in genetic modification.

[–] • 0 pt

There will be a class action.