I don't know of any household contaminates which would cause a fluorescence like that. What would you do other than wash a plate and scrub off the bristles with a razor? Gloves, ok, now what? For just a personal test I see nothing wrong with the video. To outright claim it's fake is just feckless.
>A thinking man would be skeptical of such a video. " No, a skeptic of any contrarian view of the coof is who would be skeptical. I'm skeptical of the coof therefore, yes, I have some bias but so do you.
> You want so hard to believe this is true
I hate comments like this. I don't believe in God neither, does that also mean I want so hard for that to be correct? That's a straw man argument again. I go where the evidence takes me and so far, EVERYTHING about this pandemic is suspect. I don't want or need anything to be true. If anything, I would want none of this to be true. Useless comment.
> although you initially said luciferase was not in there but now you're claiming it is
I have no idea how you can come that conclusion. It's you that said suggested that from the very first post. Gaslighting?
I'll do the test. Just need to get my hands on some swabs. For free.
I'll do the test. Just need to get my hands on some swabs. For free.
Post your results and video. I will wait for it to see where we go from here.
Will you admit luciferase enzymes are used to power nanotech?
Why would I admit that? You linked me an article in Science Daily that talks about the development of "a transformational advance has been made in an alternate lighting source, one that doesn't require a battery or a plug" but that article does not provide any proof that it is in practical use in nanotech devices. Lots of developments happen in the lab that do not ever leave because they don't scale into the practical engineering. I won't admit to luciferase powering nanotech because I see no real world proof of use of such a development. If you have some real world proof that it is being used, please point me to it.
(post is archived)