Moaaar cocksucker.

>A transformational advance has been made in an alternate lighting source, one that doesn't require a battery or a plug: high-efficient energy transfer between semiconductor quantum rods and luciferase enzymes. Quantum rods and luciferase enzymes are nanomaterials and biomaterials, respectively. When combined correctly, these materials produce bioluminescence--except, instead of coming from a biomaterial, such as a firefly enzyme, the light eminates from a nanomaterial, and is green, orange, red, or near-infrared in color.

NOW come back with a rebuttal. I'm dying to know how you squirm out of this one. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/02/160229153112.htm

It was in response to your nonsensical comment about "nanotech" when clearly, nanobots have been created for drug delivery with the usage of photothermal effect.

>Photothermal effect is a phenomenon associated with electromagnetic radiation. It is produced by the photoexcitation of material, resulting in the production of thermal energy (heat). It is sometimes used during treatment of blood vessel lesions, laser resurfacing, laser hair removal and laser surgery.

And for my bewildered and contradictory opponent, the illumination witnessed in the video is obviously radiating energy, albeit, thermal energy (infrared) is not visible to the naked eye, however the isopropanol is clearly causing a chemical reaction which has not yet been explained.

This is all in response to your pointless strawman. Moreover, because you didn't see "green light" doesn't refute anything. The camera is giving a wonky white balance because it's confusing. Your iPhone (and any camera) adjusts to color temperature. Its literally sees different types of light as different colors. If you use two different types of light in a scene, the camera can't adjust because there are too many options.