I'll do the test. Just need to get my hands on some swabs. For free.
Post your results and video. I will wait for it to see where we go from here.
Will you admit luciferase enzymes are used to power nanotech?
Why would I admit that? You linked me an article in Science Daily that talks about the development of "a transformational advance has been made in an alternate lighting source, one that doesn't require a battery or a plug" but that article does not provide any proof that it is in practical use in nanotech devices. Lots of developments happen in the lab that do not ever leave because they don't scale into the practical engineering. I won't admit to luciferase powering nanotech because I see no real world proof of use of such a development. If you have some real world proof that it is being used, please point me to it.
Your supposed to read the articles I linked. Sorry, you're just flat wrong mate. I think you need to look up Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET). https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/06/120615114104.htm
>Fireflies produce light through a chemical reaction between luciferin and it's counterpart, the enzyme luciferase. In Maye's laboratory, the enzyme is attached to the nanorod's surface; luciferin, which is added later, serves as the fuel.
>With BRET, the enzyme is attached to the surface of the rod. Luciferin is added, and acts as a kind of fuel. When the enzyme and fuel interact, they release an energy that is transferred to the rod, causing it to glow.
> "Thanks to our colleagues at Connecticut College, we have genetically manipulated enzymes of multiple colors that are attached to the rods, which, in turn, are prepared in our lab at Syracuse." https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/02/160229153112.htm
A cursory search for this tech in use today would have saved you time.
(post is archived)