Like what you're attempting to do. lol.
I've refuted everything you've said so far. What have you done? Contradiction isn't argument kid. Look, I'm all ears if you can surmise a reasonably intelligent response to those glowing particles. If you can't, you lost. Simple as that.
Look, I'm all ears if you can surmise a reasonably intelligent response to those glowing particles. If you can't, you lost. Simple as that.
My reasonable and intelligent response is that this is a faked video and no one has reproduced such results therefore it is nothing more than clickbait fear porn created by simple minded people for simple minded people. Show me someone else reproducing these same results and maybe we can come to a different conclusion.
>reasonable and intelligent
No, it was just an opinion based on incredulity. Yes, more tests need to be done but you wouldn't even consider doing one yourself because of confirmation bias. This is not "reasonable and intelligent" but diametrically opposite to the scientific method. Claiming fake without evidence is also contrary to the scientific method. You're just a contradictor and nothing more. Considering the ample breakthroughs on luciferase enzymes and the links I already provided on nanotechnology, these glowing particles ostensibly fit the hypothesis. Crying foul about it without evidence is for the lazy and unintelligent.
Yes, more tests need to be done but you wouldn't even consider doing one yourself because of confirmation bias.
I would gladly test this out if I could get a test swab. I would carefully plan and execute a much more rigorous scientific test and record all measured data and observations. I would also do everything I could to eliminate as many error causing variables such as contaminated glassware and reagents so that the observed effects, if any, would not be attributable to other unknown events and materials. This video is the opposite of what I would do. Have you performed the test yourself? I'm sure you haven't and neither has anyone else.
A thinking man would be skeptical of such a video. Using only one data point taken from an unknown and unverified source to then draw conclusions of fact is something only a fool would do. You want so hard to believe this is true that you have thrown any semblance of skepticism out the window with your bias. You are using the same methods the Qtards use for supporting their "proofs" when debating skeptics. You are using unrelated information to back up your claims of truth in this video (although you initially said luciferase was not in there but now you're claiming it is). You are also trying to insult me because you cannot defend your position without resorting to personal attacks. These are all the same tactics that 'certain people' like to use. Are you one of those people?
(post is archived)