![The jews and their lies [1080x1454 - 170KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/nCPfol.jpg){kind=link}
I never see any of the people who complain about (for example) nestle selling watter in bottles complain about the state selling it in pipes.
I mean when you need massive quantities of water from far away to fill your tub or wash your car and they have to be delivered under public roadways/from public reservoirs... Involvement of the state is going to be a necessary evil.
And for what it's worth the state is anti-white too and put crap in the water.
Lol yeah fuck the government. Also does Pepsi or whoever even bother to filter to filter out what the state puts in, lol?
Ok, the only potentially misleading bit I can see there is "spring water." If it's just tapwater then that's pretty underhanded.
As for "natural"... that word means nothing and everything. I don't feel sympathy for any adult who believes in greenwashing marketing spin.
Same for the charitable stuff, every company donates something to some charity nowadays, so it's pretty bland and meaningless.
Yes but just because all the jews do love to jew and jew they do, should we ignore the jewery of this jew?
I mean... I don't think the average starbucks customer is shopping for the cheapest drink. They're the same people who buy iphones and hybrids.
Agreed SB is the ultimate enabler here, they are marking up the water tremendously to push you into buying a coffee, rather than a cheap water with your bagel. I don't like this sort of movie theater/amusement concessions/air port exclusivity model (which is the other place you see Ethos water) though, it's deceptive to hide costs in some non-commodity.
A better solution would be an open water market where anyone capable of doing so can supply.
That already exists though, they just have to also compete with the public water supply. Poland Springs is bottled from a private spring in Maine (the most fresh water on the continent). Coors operates in the same way, they own a spring in a very water rich area, which they turn into piss for mass consumption.
I do agree that you should be able to opt out of state services and not be taxed for them. I don't get public water or sewer, why should I have to pay in full for it?
I mean when you need massive quantities of water from far away to fill your tub or wash your car and they have to be delivered under public roadways/from public reservoirs... Involvement of the state is going to be a necessary evil.
Why should the resevoirs be public? Or the roads for that matter? Way I see it, the people who own the water should be selling it while paying fees to competing pipelines leasing or buying easements from all the landowners along the way.
If that winds up too expensive, maybe they should be looking into reverse osmosis plants, or being more careful about recycling water, or maybe the city doesn't belong there period.
Lol yeah fuck the government. Also does Pepsi or whoever even bother to filter to filter out what the state puts in, lol?
I'd imagine not.
Yes but just because all the jews do love to jew and jew they do, should we ignore the jewery of this jew?
Eh. Fools and their money. There has to be some kind of consumer accountability somewhere along the way. They have the same option you do: Steel flask with a day's worth of water. If they choose not to avail of it that's their call.
Agreed SB is the ultimate enabler here, they are marking up the water tremendously to push you into buying a coffee, rather than a cheap water with your bagel. I don't like this sort of movie theater/amusement concessions/air port exclusivity model though, it's deceptive to hide costs in some non-commodity.
Me neither, but I don't use it so it's largely not an issue to me. The only place I really have to buy water is airports because they don't let you bring your own. Then again I'm not exactly flying much these days so that's not an issue either.
Why should the resevoirs be public? Or the roads for that matter?
Settling interstate commerce disputes is pretty much the entire impetus for the Fed to begin with. We could go down this rabbit hole but it's literally been debated about a billion times.
It's been a good debate though, I'm glad I didn't call you a kiekniggerfaggot right off the bat :D
Settling interstate commerce disputes is pretty much the entire impetus for the Fed to begin with. We could go down this rabbit hole but it's literally been debated about a billion times.
Well, you certainly can't accuse me of being a federalist.
It's been a good debate though, I'm glad I didn't call you a kiekniggerfaggot right off the bat :D
Thanks niggerfaggot, I appreciate it.
(post is archived)