WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.1K

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

I've done my research and what was suggested in that post is utter garbage.

If you have law or legal precedent, let's see it. I'm not your researcher for horseshit.

We don't subscribe to "international law". There is no international legal body with jurisdiction in the US, and fuck everything that has anything to do with France. What utter fucking stupidity.

[–] 0 pt

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_jure_belli_ac_pacis

Start there. International Law and specific legal definitions were a thing in the 18th century so that two nations could agree on terminology utilized in legal disputes across borders.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

You are full of shit.

Presidential eligibility doesn't have shit to do with international treaty or determination of war satus. And you're link doesn't either.

Stop stroking me, ya fucking homo.

[–] 0 pt

Since you're obviously retarded, let me walk you through this.

You're authoring a law in 1780 and you need people to understand what you're writing. How do you define "natural born citizen"? How do you define "naturalized" citizen? You turn to a legal dictionary, obviously, or else you would have to define your terms in the document itself and you would have to be as specific as possible to prevent confusion.

Since the documents themselves do not define the terms, one would have to consult period documents to determine how those terms were defined.