Mirror:
https://vid8.poal.co/user/AOU/y82tMt4
Now there is a fast thought process and eloquent speech that I havent seen in a while
Now there is a fast thought process and eloquent speech that I havent seen in a while
He's clearly been debating a lot trying to get people to wake up. But he goes too fast for someone who doesn't already know everything he is talking about. He rattles off a lot of complicated ideas. It's entertaining but not effective. Which is unfortunate. But as someone who has heard it all before and agrees I find it very enjoyable. He condensed what could be a dissertation into a few minutes.
He's clearly been debating a lot trying to get people to wake up. But he goes too fast for someone who doesn't already know everything he is talking about. He rattles off a lot of complicated ideas. It's entertaining but not effective. Which is unfortunate. But as someone who has heard it all before and agrees I find it very enjoyable. He condensed what could be a dissertation into a few minutes.
He's reading a text in front of him, look at this eyes going from left to right. And he certainly didn't just improvised his speech, he wrote it down, repeated, lots of repetitions before the final take. You too can do that, and yes it takes time and efforts
He's reading a text in front of him, look at this eyes going from left to right. And he certainly didn't just improvised his speech, he wrote it down, repeated, lots of repetitions before the final take. You too can do that, and yes it takes time and efforts
Aaw
Aaw
on the other hand you have a lot of people guzzling hydrogen peroxide thinking it's going to cure cancer, because they watched some swivel eyed loon on bitchute telling them "big pharma is trying to kill him for unrevealing the truth..."
most people would have a longer life if they believed a scientific consensus rather than some outlier opinions, because the next event might be a bit less suspicious than this one was.
on the other hand you have a lot of people guzzling hydrogen peroxide thinking it's going to cure cancer, because they watched some swivel eyed loon on bitchute telling them "big pharma is trying to kill him for unrevealing the truth..."
most people would have a longer life if they believed a scientific consensus rather than some outlier opinions,
because the next event might be a bit less suspicious than this one was.
you have a lot of people guzzling hydrogen
Do you have a source for that absurd claim?
most people would have a longer life if they believed a scientific consensus
How about that one?
And let's be honest about the fact that scientific consensus in today's age of censorship and academic capture by corporations means believing in corporate propaganda.
Rejecting corporate propaganda does not mean rejecting science nor does it mean believing every other claim.
>you have a lot of people guzzling hydrogen
Do you have a source for that absurd claim?
>most people would have a longer life if they believed a scientific consensus
How about that one?
And let's be honest about the fact that scientific consensus in today's age of censorship and academic capture by corporations means believing in corporate propaganda.
Rejecting corporate propaganda does not mean rejecting science nor does it mean believing every other claim.
Do you have a source for that absurd claim?
https://www.facebook.com/stacey.kidd.940/posts/2980243585562366/ https://www.bitchute.com/video/GjCemH1xTG7T/ https://www.bitchute.com/video/z0diDbK6dwww/ etc...
do you have a retraction for me for calling something absurd without checking first?
scientific consensus in today's age of censorship and academic capture by corporations
which would require the consensus to all pretend that their research matched some made up conclusion, except you can go and read their research statistics and mostly agree with their conclusion as to what the data is suggesting
your theoretical position is therefore that all research data is made up too and that nobody ever blows the whistle on this mass conspiracy to subvert everyone's independent research.
Reality is that everyone has a bunch of slightly theories based on slightly differing results, the vast majority lean one way, they rest end up on bitshute
>Do you have a source for that absurd claim?
https://www.facebook.com/stacey.kidd.940/posts/2980243585562366/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/GjCemH1xTG7T/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/z0diDbK6dwww/
etc...
do you have a retraction for me for calling something absurd without checking first?
>scientific consensus in today's age of censorship and academic capture by corporations
which would require the consensus to all pretend that their research matched some made up conclusion,
except you can go and read their research statistics and mostly agree with their conclusion as to what the data is suggesting
your theoretical position is therefore that all research data is made up too and that nobody ever blows the whistle on this mass conspiracy to subvert everyone's independent research.
Reality is that everyone has a bunch of slightly theories based on slightly differing results,
the vast majority lean one way, they rest end up on bitshute
(post is archived)