>PBS has the credibility of a Pfizer spokesperson. It doesn't matter if you believe this. This isn't a write-up on politics, this is a science piece and all their points are cited with actual research. Unlike the constant deluge of anti-science, misinformation articles posted on poal about the vaccines, their points directly tie back to an actual study and they are not lying. I've commented around dozens of times, now, on the articles some of you fools are posting on Poal where the authors cite a study but say the opposite of what the study says. This is not the case in this PBS article and is actually quite a good write-up. You'd think someone like you would be happy about that because some of what they talk about his the grossly diminished capacity of the vaccines against Omicron. You need to learn how to separate your bias away from facts. If you run into facts that clearly shows your opinion is wrong, you need to adjust your opinion and figure out what you new bias should look like. >Logically the jabs have zero effectiveness against any variant because they only provide protection against one spike protein. And it is the spike protein which is most likely to mutate. And this comment of yours shows your ignorance. Multiple antigens are targeted on the spike protein. What's different about Omicron is the 20+ mutations on the spike protein which makes it harder for the immunological factors to target in the vaccines. It's like the virus put on camouflage for your immune system. And the vaccines are not the only thing affected by this large set of mutations - natural immunity is also significantly less effective against Omicron. You'd know this if you didn't piss your pants about the link that aggregates all the research we currently have on Omicron and actually read it.