China is currently the largest emitter of greenhouse gasses, I think the US wins historically and has huge per-capita emissions. If you want to start killing people off to solve the problem, perhaps Africa isn't the logical choice.
We build civilizations, whites and asians. Niggers dont. Go live in a mud hut with them and stop heating up the earth by living in a first world nation you fucking hypocrite
My municipality halved garbage collection and introduced recycling to be eco friendly. 5-10 years later it has been revealed that the "recycling" involved trucking and ocean shipping to a Chinese landfill, and the only reason anyone said anything about it was because the Chinese government put a stop to importing garbage so now they are looking to India or other countries dumb enough to take it under the guise of recycling.
There is a pattern of scamming people tied up with global warming and eco friendly bullshit, so much so that I believe that's the entire point. Take David Susuki's lifestyle now for example. https://torontosun.com/2013/10/11/the-two-suzukis-theres-saint-suzuki-the-one-you-see-on-cbc-and-secret-suzuki-the-capitalist-millionaire/wcm/41e5eca5-3efa-4a1f-91c7-e4445e4dc367 He was the poster boy for the enviro-tards.
From my day-to-day interactions with eco-nuts, I find I appreciate and protect nature far more than they do, and I'm not even getting a slice of the sweet eco-taxes to fund lunatic carbon capture schemes or to go jetting off to the conferences to discuss the issues and resolve to put more taxes in force. Funny how that works.
Yes, of course eco-related scams are a thing. If you really want to follow the money, there is a hell of a lot more profit involved for much larger corporations, by convincing people that anthropogenic global warming is not happening.
That's possible.
Assuming it is happening (and that's a big assumption), rather than trying to get people to live lifestyles akin to monkeys in Siberia, why don't you promote nuclear energy and a reduction in regulation making it economically competitive with coal?
you know water is a greenhouse gas? It's the most prevelent greenhouse gas.
Should we get rid of water?
You being stupid enough to ask this question, almost guarantees you're not smart enough to understand the answer. But whatever (skepticalscience.com).
So when something else causes a temperature increase (such as extra CO2 from fossil fuels.)
No agenda there, considering fossile fuels aren't actually the largest source of CO2 output.
Also CO2 is necessary for all life on earth, the more CO2, the more vegetation and growth.
Also changes in CO2 lag temp, not the other way around, just like water vapor.
Why aren't you a proponent of at least some basic population controls in Africa? You seem to be deflecting by mentioning China, but China has already imposed population controls of its own accord, and through various manufacturing and eco scams actually looks like a worse polluter than it is.
I have nothing against sensibly considering population control globally.
But the rest of the world has had quite sensible population control, simply from their human nature, if you ignore allowing shitskin imports to replace themselves.
(post is archived)