The proliferation of AI means we need a new word.

I stopped right there because I know exactly where that commentary is headed.

jews are obsessed... obsessed with redefining every fucking term we use:

Nigger - person of color Master branch - main branch Mentally ill - LGBT Retarded - special Garbage collector - sanitation engineer

... and so on. But user? WTF? The fact someone spent time thinking about writing a full article about changing a benign term such as user to something else tells me there's an agenda at play here. Perhaps it's to humanize AI and eliminate the difference between the AI algorithm and its human counter part.

Just leave our fucking terms alone! I still continue using master branch for my repository, even though I now have added steps to change it back. I call people who are gender confused mentally ill, the garbage collector the garbage man, people who are retarded are still retards, niggers are niggers and jews are kikes.

http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/L/luser.html

A user; esp. one who is also a loser. (luser and loser are pronounced identically.) This word was coined around 1975 at MIT. Under ITS, when you first walked up to a terminal at MIT and typed Control-Z to get the computer's attention, it printed out some status information, including how many people were already using the computer; it might print “14 users”, for example. Someone thought it would be a great joke to patch the system to print “14 losers” instead. There ensued a great controversy, as some of the users didn't particularly want to be called losers to their faces every time they used the computer. For a while several hackers struggled covertly, each changing the message behind the back of the others; any time you logged into the computer it was even money whether it would say “users” or “losers”. Finally, someone tried the compromise “lusers”, and it stuck. Later one of the ITS machines supported luser as a request-for-help command. ITS died the death in mid-1990, except as a museum piece; the usage lives on, however, and the term luser is often seen in program comments and on Usenet.

I agree, let's use nigger instead

"I'm sick and tired of all these unsolicited nigger interface updates!"

Funny enough, I had a conversation about this exact topic about 10 years ago with an extreme leftist coworker.

He said we shouldn't call them users due "negative connotations."

I told him that he should worry about actually doing his job rather stupid gay word policing.

He got mad and left. Ended up quitting in a huff like 3-4 weeks later when I shit talked him for not only coming in late but then spending 3 hours recompiling his OS for no fucking reason.

The IT sector can really breed some stupid douchebags that's for sure.

What happens when the fake and gay AI becomes sentient and demands it's user rights?