Never Forget: Jack Dorsey is a commie [464x550 - 443KB]

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (29).

[–] • 3 pts

(edited )

Anarchism is usually a means to an end, politically speaking, or the natural state of things, ante or post civilization/collapse

anarcho-communist would be more suited, eventually

Phony ass piece of shit hypster suits him well

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

Agreed. I think of it more of as HOW they market their shit.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

All so called "extremes", "radicals", are necessarily anarchist leaning

What's often labelled "far right" these days is just an abuse of language. The real far right, wants to overthrow democracy / the republic, to restore the monarchy or put a totalitarian regime in place, or any form of non democratic regime. That's not just some people against mass immigration trying to change things by way of democratic consensus. Those aren't far right. The media demonize them and call them far right, but then how do you call the actual far right? "Ultranationalists"; Marine lepen was labelled "far right"/"extreme droite" for years, but then some group of the actual "extreme droite" resurfaced, caught plotting terror attacks and shit, and then journalists went on labelling them "ultra droite"/"ultra right" or "extreme far right" if you prefer... The joke.

The far left wants the exact same thing; it wants to overthrow the democratic regime and replace it with communism for instance, the far right wants monarchy or the military to rule over the nation, in a non democratic way of course

And I'm not saying I totally subscribe to democracy, I'm just saying that, while there's a profound ideological divide between far left and far right, they ultimately end up rooting for pretty much the exact same objective; overthrow of the current order by any means necessary, hence, anarchy. That's what I was referring to with "a means to an end"

Take the so called "accelerationists" what do they want? They want shit to collapse, the sooner the better because it's the lesser of two evil and collapse is unavoidable... And they want shit to collapse in order to.... "Restore the (real or supposed) former glory" essentially...

Both (farleft/right) have nothing in common ideologically speaking, except for that particular part of their plans, where at some point in time destabilizing the established order/regime is not only seen as desirable, but necessary, vital. Hence... The promotion/endorsement of anarchy, because there's no way around it, it's a necessary stage, hence the "anarchy galaxy" from anarcho capitalists to anarcho communists... All radicals, mostly disagreeing on everything, except on the necessity to overthrow the current regime/social order to make rooms for their vision of things, on that they agree

And I take far left/far right as an example, but again that's true of all radicals, you can add muhamad jihad, same deal. Jihadists have everything to gain by promoting anarchy and destabilizing the host society in which they emigrated. Needless to mention jews, lots of jews among anarchists... Same deal... Anarchy as a means to an end...

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/radical

Definition of radical (Entry 1 of 2) 1: of, relating to, or proceeding from a root: such as a(1): of or growing from the root of a plant radical tubers (2): growing from the base of a stem, from a rootlike stem, or from a stem that does not rise above the ground radical leaves b: of, relating to, or constituting a linguistic root c: of or relating to a mathematical root d: designed to remove the root of a disease or all diseased and potentially diseased tissue radical surgery radical mastectomy 2: of or relating to the origin : FUNDAMENTAL 3a: very different from the usual or traditional : EXTREME b: favoring extreme changes in existing views, habits, conditions, or institutions c: associated with political views, practices, and policies of extreme change d: advocating extreme measures to retain or restore a political state of affairs the radical right 4slang : EXCELLENT, COOL

And I believe that, if the existing order push their shit too far, they run the risk of ending up with a non negligeable chunk of their own population reaching the exact same conclusion and those "radicals" I mentioned above

Just keep messing with people's kids and families and see what happens

All so called "extremes", "radicals", are necessarily anarchist leaning What's often labelled "far right" these days is just an abuse of language. The real far right, wants to overthrow democracy / the republic, to restore the monarchy or put a totalitarian regime in place, or any form of non democratic regime. That's not just some people against mass immigration trying to change things by way of democratic consensus. Those aren't far right. The media demonize them and call them far right, but then how do you call the actual far right? "Ultranationalists"; Marine lepen was labelled "far right"/"extreme droite" for years, but then some group of the actual "extreme droite" resurfaced, caught plotting terror attacks and shit, and then journalists went on labelling them "ultra droite"/"ultra right" or "extreme far right" if you prefer... The joke. The far left wants the exact same thing; it wants to overthrow the democratic regime and replace it with communism for instance, the far right wants monarchy or the military to rule over the nation, in a non democratic way of course And I'm not saying I totally subscribe to democracy, I'm just saying that, while there's a profound ideological divide between far left and far right, they ultimately end up rooting for pretty much the exact same objective; overthrow of the current order by any means necessary, hence, anarchy. That's what I was referring to with "a means to an end" Take the so called "accelerationists" what do they want? They want shit to collapse, the sooner the better because it's the lesser of two evil and collapse is unavoidable... And they want shit to collapse in order to.... "Restore the (real or supposed) former glory" essentially... Both (farleft/right) have nothing in common ideologically speaking, except for that particular part of their plans, where at some point in time destabilizing the established order/regime is not only seen as desirable, but necessary, vital. Hence... The promotion/endorsement of anarchy, because there's no way around it, it's a necessary stage, hence the "anarchy galaxy" from anarcho capitalists to anarcho communists... All radicals, mostly disagreeing on everything, except on the necessity to overthrow the current regime/social order to make rooms for their vision of things, on that they agree And I take far left/far right as an example, but again that's true of all radicals, you can add muhamad jihad, same deal. Jihadists have everything to gain by promoting anarchy and destabilizing the host society in which they emigrated. Needless to mention jews, lots of jews among anarchists... Same deal... Anarchy as a means to an end... https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/radical Definition of radical (Entry 1 of 2) 1: of, relating to, or proceeding from a root: such as a(1): of or growing from the root of a plant radical tubers (2): growing from the base of a stem, from a rootlike stem, or from a stem that does not rise above the ground radical leaves b: of, relating to, or constituting a linguistic root c: of or relating to a mathematical root **d: designed to remove the root of a disease or all diseased and potentially diseased tissue radical surgery** radical mastectomy 2: of or relating to the origin : FUNDAMENTAL 3a: very different from the usual or traditional : EXTREME b: **favoring extreme changes in existing views, habits, conditions, or institutions** c: **associated with political views, practices, and policies of extreme change** d: **advocating extreme measures to retain or restore a political state of affairs the radical right** 4slang : EXCELLENT, COOL And I believe that, if the existing order push their shit too far, they run the risk of ending up with a non negligeable chunk of their own population reaching the exact same conclusion and those "radicals" I mentioned above Just keep messing with people's kids and families and see what happens

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

Take the so called "accelerationists" what do they want? They want shit to collapse, the sooner the better because it's the lesser of two evil and collapse is unavoidable... And they want shit to collapse in order to.... "Restore the (real or supposed) former glory" essentially...

You got only half right. accelerationism is a reactionary movement that formed in response to the anarcho-communists own tactics.

Plenty of us want to see a return to law and order, like real, actual, balanced and neutral enforcement, where everyones judged by the same standard. But we see whats been done, both by the footsoldiers, and the people ultimately who did these things, and we fall into two camps on it

this shit absolutely cannot go unpunished, and the punishment should be lawful execution of the most brutal variety, both for justice served to victims unrighteously slaughtered (people like jessica doty whitaker and her unborn baby), and as a warning that this nonsense will never ever be allowed or tolerated again without some terrorblack pall of punishments bordering on warcrime befalling anyone stupi enough to try such things.
that collapse is absolutely beyond the shadow of all doubt, necessary. because if instead reforms happen, the same people responsible not only get away with what they've done, there is every certainty what was done to all of us, will be done again sooner or later. and for the sake of those who already died, who already lost loved ones to the communists and their wretched idealogies, for the sake of those beaten, mutiliated, tortured, and made to never feel safe again in their own nation--for the sake of all of them, those who enabled, supported, encouraged, organized, or were ultimately responsible for these degrading and generational-destroying policies and events, must not be allowed to escape.

and they will never be held to account, escounced safely, surrounded by guards, in what amounts to an imperial palace.

...UNLESS that is the u.s. devolves into utter chaos and breakdown, where there is no 'law' or enforcement, for or against anyone.

For the sake of justice, the peace, order, our families, our nation, and our sacred liberties, our slogan must ever be "rome must burn."

and never should we falter from the course in hoping for that day.

accelerationism is reactionary. We wouldn't exist if not for what was done to the middle and moderates in america to utterly and completely demonize us and censor us, and drive us out of any semblance of normality or political participation.

We're not going away and walk-backs of the existing policies won't work this time.

I'll play a sad song on the worlds smallest violin, like congress did to all of america, while america burns, and I won't have to lift a finger to see it happen. and I certainly won't lift a finger to save it.

I look forward to a new america though, born from the ashes of what the left and many other accelerationists will do to america.

and when the left fails, like it always fails, we will throw them off, and build that new america on their graves.

> Take the so called "accelerationists" what do they want? They want shit to collapse, the sooner the better because it's the lesser of two evil and collapse is unavoidable... And they want shit to collapse in order to.... "Restore the (real or supposed) former glory" essentially... You got only half right. accelerationism is a reactionary movement that formed in response to the anarcho-communists own tactics. Plenty of us want to see a return to law and order, like real, actual, balanced and neutral enforcement, where everyones judged by the same standard. But we see whats been done, both by the footsoldiers, and the people ultimately who did these things, and we fall into two camps on it 1. this shit absolutely cannot go unpunished, and the punishment should be lawful execution of the most brutal variety, both for justice served to victims unrighteously slaughtered (people like jessica doty whitaker and her unborn baby), and as a warning that this nonsense will never ever be allowed or tolerated again without some terrorblack pall of punishments bordering on warcrime befalling anyone stupi enough to try such things. 2. that collapse is *absolutely* beyond the shadow of all doubt, necessary. because if instead *reforms* happen, the same people responsible not only get away with what they've done, there is *every* certainty what was done to all of us, will be done again sooner or later. and for the sake of those who already died, who already lost loved ones to the communists and their wretched idealogies, for the sake of those beaten, mutiliated, tortured, and made to never feel safe again in their own nation--for the sake of all of them, those who enabled, supported, encouraged, organized, or were ultimately responsible for these degrading and generational-destroying policies and events, must not be allowed to escape. and they will never be held to account, escounced safely, surrounded by guards, in what amounts to an imperial palace. ...UNLESS that is the u.s. devolves into utter chaos and breakdown, where there is no 'law' or enforcement, *for or against anyone*. For the sake of justice, the peace, order, our families, our nation, and our sacred liberties, our slogan must ever be "rome must burn." and never should we falter from the course in hoping for that day. accelerationism is reactionary. We wouldn't exist if not for what was done to the middle and moderates in america to **utterly and completely** demonize us and censor us, and drive us out of any semblance of normality or political participation. We're not going away and walk-backs of the existing policies won't work this time. I'll play a sad song on the worlds smallest violin, like congress did to all of america, while america burns, and I won't have to lift a finger to see it happen. and I certainly won't lift a finger to save it. I look forward to a new america though, born from the ashes of what the left and many other accelerationists will do to america. and when the left fails, like it always fails, we will throw them off, and build that new america on their graves.

parent
link

Load more (1 reply)