All so called "extremes", "radicals", are necessarily anarchist leaning What's often labelled "far right" these days is just an abuse of language. The real far right, wants to overthrow democracy / the republic, to restore the monarchy or put a totalitarian regime in place, or any form of non democratic regime. That's not just some people against mass immigration trying to change things by way of democratic consensus. Those aren't far right. The media demonize them and call them far right, but then how do you call the actual far right? "Ultranationalists"; Marine lepen was labelled "far right"/"extreme droite" for years, but then some group of the actual "extreme droite" resurfaced, caught plotting terror attacks and shit, and then journalists went on labelling them "ultra droite"/"ultra right" or "extreme far right" if you prefer... The joke. The far left wants the exact same thing; it wants to overthrow the democratic regime and replace it with communism for instance, the far right wants monarchy or the military to rule over the nation, in a non democratic way of course And I'm not saying I totally subscribe to democracy, I'm just saying that, while there's a profound ideological divide between far left and far right, they ultimately end up rooting for pretty much the exact same objective; overthrow of the current order by any means necessary, hence, anarchy. That's what I was referring to with "a means to an end" Take the so called "accelerationists" what do they want? They want shit to collapse, the sooner the better because it's the lesser of two evil and collapse is unavoidable... And they want shit to collapse in order to.... "Restore the (real or supposed) former glory" essentially... Both (farleft/right) have nothing in common ideologically speaking, except for that particular part of their plans, where at some point in time destabilizing the established order/regime is not only seen as desirable, but necessary, vital. Hence... The promotion/endorsement of anarchy, because there's no way around it, it's a necessary stage, hence the "anarchy galaxy" from anarcho capitalists to anarcho communists... All radicals, mostly disagreeing on everything, except on the necessity to overthrow the current regime/social order to make rooms for their vision of things, on that they agree And I take far left/far right as an example, but again that's true of all radicals, you can add muhamad jihad, same deal. Jihadists have everything to gain by promoting anarchy and destabilizing the host society in which they emigrated. Needless to mention jews, lots of jews among anarchists... Same deal... Anarchy as a means to an end... https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/radical Definition of radical (Entry 1 of 2) 1: of, relating to, or proceeding from a root: such as a(1): of or growing from the root of a plant radical tubers (2): growing from the base of a stem, from a rootlike stem, or from a stem that does not rise above the ground radical leaves b: of, relating to, or constituting a linguistic root c: of or relating to a mathematical root **d: designed to remove the root of a disease or all diseased and potentially diseased tissue radical surgery** radical mastectomy 2: of or relating to the origin : FUNDAMENTAL 3a: very different from the usual or traditional : EXTREME b: **favoring extreme changes in existing views, habits, conditions, or institutions** c: **associated with political views, practices, and policies of extreme change** d: **advocating extreme measures to retain or restore a political state of affairs the radical right** 4slang : EXCELLENT, COOL And I believe that, if the existing order push their shit too far, they run the risk of ending up with a non negligeable chunk of their own population reaching the exact same conclusion and those "radicals" I mentioned above Just keep messing with people's kids and families and see what happens