That's not what SCOTUS said. They simply stated Texas didn't provide enough evidence the feds are breaking the law and as such the injunction is stayed. That's it. They also said they believed what the feds are doing is highly questionable.
https://poal.co/s/LawAndLegalMatters/691897
Needles to say, most every (((outlet))) is editorializing the implication rather than what SCOTUS actually said or ruled on.
Do they just assume Americans don't understand how our government is supposed to work?
When I said that I was talking about the journalist that wrote the headline. I know the Supreme Court didn't say that because they don't have authority to say that. Their job is simple, interpret the Constitution as it applies to whatever the current litigation might be. In other words all they actually said was that it is not unconstitutional for the feds to cut the wire. That's literally all they can say...
Good summary.
(post is archived)