Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

317

For context, I disagree with the Catholic church and I am not Catholic myself. But up until recently, I simply considered it a matter of difference, similar to a church who firmly believes that water baptism is needed for salvation, as opposed to another who simply see it as an outward expression of your conversion and faith. But with the pope's recent changes to fundamental church doctrine lately, I have to ask: Why and How can you still follow a church that is betraying the teachings of Jesus Christ himself? I understand one of the cornerstones of Catholic faith is faith in the church, so much as doctrine spoken by the pope is considered on par with scripture itself. But how can you continue to condone the actions of a MAN (Yes, the pope is human at the end of the day) who speaks "law" which directly contradicts Christ's teachings? Does this not bother you or cause a moment's pause to think "Maybe this isn't the correct church?"

For context: https://www.breitbart.com/faith/2023/11/12/vatican-says-transsexuals-and-homoaffective-persons-can-be-baptized-serve-as-godparents/

For context, I disagree with the Catholic church and I am not Catholic myself. But up until recently, I simply considered it a matter of difference, similar to a church who firmly believes that water baptism is needed for salvation, as opposed to another who simply see it as an outward expression of your conversion and faith. But with the pope's recent changes to fundamental church doctrine lately, I have to ask: Why and How can you still follow a church that is betraying the teachings of Jesus Christ himself? I understand one of the cornerstones of Catholic faith is faith in the church, so much as doctrine spoken by the pope is considered on par with scripture itself. But how can you continue to condone the actions of a MAN (Yes, the pope is human at the end of the day) who speaks "law" which directly contradicts Christ's teachings? Does this not bother you or cause a moment's pause to think "Maybe this isn't the correct church?" For context: https://www.breitbart.com/faith/2023/11/12/vatican-says-transsexuals-and-homoaffective-persons-can-be-baptized-serve-as-godparents/

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (55).
[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Faith is belief without proof.

The entire crux of the Christian faith is the empty tomb. Without the empty tomb, nothing else is legit. During the course of gospels, the writers take careful pains to give specific towns and cities, specific people (in as much as they could in some cases), and specific situations. These writings were done within the lifetime of people who could have discounted these claims. Mark and Matthew in particular, the two books which scholars think were the first two written, were written for specific audiences so that they could go out and verify what was being said. The fact that the only detractors of these accounts were the same jews who murdered Jesus should tell you what you need to know about it.

Even if you believe the Gospel, of the 12 Apostles that actually Walked and Talked with Jesus, 3 of THEM didn't have enough faith to accept He was the Son of God. (Peter/Thomas/Judas)

Judas killed himself because he realized he murdered the Son of God and could not handle the guilt of his actions.

Peter didn't doubt Jesus, he was a coward. There's a difference. He saw Jesus literally transfigure himself. He KNEW who Jesus is. He was just afraid, at the time, of going to the cross with his Lord.

Thomas is the only one who you could argue who had doubts prior to the resurrection. But after he touched the wounds, he himself also attested to Jesus being Lord.

John 20 24-29

24 Now Thomas (also known as Didymus[a]), one of the Twelve, was not with the disciples when Jesus came. 25 So the other disciples told him, “We have seen the Lord!”

But he said to them, “Unless I see the nail marks in his hands and put my finger where the nails were, and put my hand into his side, I will not believe.”

26 A week later his disciples were in the house again, and Thomas was with them. Though the doors were locked, Jesus came and stood among them and said, “Peace be with you!” 27 Then he said to Thomas, “Put your finger here; see my hands. Reach out your hand and put it into my side. Stop doubting and believe.”

28 Thomas said to him, “My Lord and my God!”

29 Then Jesus told him, “Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.”

I don't have faith in the stories told by jews 2,000 years ago.

Scribed down by jews. But if you don't have faith, I can't argue with you either way on the subject except to say that most of the OT has a lot of archeological evidence to back up the claims.

[–] • 0 pt

Before I was a week old, they cut the end of my dick off and tried to drown me because some bitch ate an apple a million years ago, so forgive me if I have my doubts about religion.

[–] • 1 pt

So you haven't spent the time to actually research Christianity outside of the propaganda that was spread by the very kikes you claim to hate?

I won't sit here saying that I'll pray for you, even though I will, but I do strongly implore you to study the bibles history, new testament in particular. I also won't try and hammer at you the words Christ spoke, except to say that you already recognize that there is true, pure, wicked evil in our world, and only one person has given us the roadmap to separate ourselves from it and arms us to speak back against it with authority.

[–] • 0 pt

...and only one person has given us the roadmap to separate ourselves from it and arms us to speak back against it with authority.

And yet those words and that authority are being used to advance the destruction of the White race with the help of White Christians. They believe we are all Children of God which means they believe in equality among the races despite all evidence to the contrary. This is a weapon being wielded against my people and I'll have none of it.