WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

579

I’ve wrestled with this for a while, just want to see what you guys think.

We’re commanded to forgive as God has forgiven. Ok, fair enough. Seems a simple concept at face value.

But when you really dig in, what does that mean?

Most Christians say that forgiveness is something you do, regardless of whether the offending party confesses, apologizes, or repents.

But then look at how God operates. He requires confession and repentance for forgiveness. Neither is optional.

So then, God holds us to a higher standard than even himself in this regard?

That doesn’t seem logical or reasonable to me. But hey, perhaps I’m wrong. I’m just thinking nakedly here.

I’ve also heard a pastor say that forgiving someone - regardless of a confession or apology - allows God to take up your case. The analogy being that in a court of law, it’s better to let the judge take up the case than to take it up yourself. Ok, I can see the logic in that, too.

But I’m still flummoxed by the idea that we are held to a higher standard than God holds for himself. Again, he requires confession and repentance for forgiveness.

I’ve wrestled with this for a while, just want to see what you guys think. We’re commanded to forgive as God has forgiven. Ok, fair enough. Seems a simple concept at face value. But when you really dig in, what does that mean? Most Christians say that forgiveness is something you do, regardless of whether the offending party confesses, apologizes, or repents. But then look at how God operates. He *requires* confession and repentance for forgiveness. Neither is optional. So then, God holds us to a higher standard than even himself in this regard? That doesn’t seem logical or reasonable to me. But hey, perhaps I’m wrong. I’m just thinking nakedly here. I’ve also heard a pastor say that forgiving someone - regardless of a confession or apology - allows God to take up your case. The analogy being that in a court of law, it’s better to let the judge take up the case than to take it up yourself. Ok, I can see the logic in that, too. But I’m still flummoxed by the idea that we are held to a higher standard than God holds for himself. Again, he *requires* confession and repentance for forgiveness.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt (edited )

I should have made it clear, but I’m really only interested from those who truly understand God and the Bible.

Not to sound pretentious, but you don’t understand the Bible, fren.

I don’t want to make this into a sermon, but I’ll explain because I want to make it clear that I’m not trying to bash you personally so much as point out a fact.

There is no “God of the Old Testament” and separate “God of the New Testament”. Again, not bashing you for thinking this because many do. I myself wrestled with this concept for a long time until I finally understood that it wasn’t God who changed, but man’s circumstances on the earth that changed.

Most (if not all) human sin is directly inspired or compelled by demonic entities. That especially goes for the most egregious of sins, IE those specifically forbidden in the Ten Commandments. This is a premise, which if you don’t accept it, then the rest doesn’t make sense…

Ok so here’s the thing: deliverance (from demonic entities) wasn’t available prior to Christ’s arrival.

So, when a demonic entity would take hold of a person in the Old Testament, the only way to stop that sin dead in its tracks and keep it at bay..IE, keep it from spreading amongst the tribe, was to kill that person straight out. Because they couldn’t be delivered otherwise..because Christ hadn’t yet come and then sent the Holy Spirit to the earth.. men hadn’t yet been given the authority to drive the entities out. Because that authority couldn’t be given by anyone but Christ, and not until he had arrived to fulfill his mission.

It’s the very reason why in the Old Testament they stoned adulterers, and yet Christ saved the adulterous woman from being stoned. It’s because just his mere presence drove that demon away and also convicted the woman into repentance.

Hopefully that makes sense. There’s more to it all, but that’s the cliff’s notes version. It’s not taught in most churches because most pastors don’t even understand the Bible.

Ok so back to the actual issue at hand here…

My confusion on the issue of forgiveness has nothing to do with and Old Testament god vs a New Testament god. It has to do with the idea that the word says “forgive those who wrong you as God forgives you.”

“As God forgives you” being the key phrase..which begs the question “well then, how does god forgive you”?

According to the Bible, God will forgive those who accept Christ, confess their sins, and repent. Those three things are required and not optional.

However, most accepted Christian theology touts that we should forgive regardless of a confession or apology from the offender in question, which is not what even God himself does since a confession and repentance are required by him. Did I say required? Yes, required. As in, not optional.

So then, it seems as if God holds us to an even higher standard than himself.

So either he does (which I find hard to believe), I’m missing something as it relates to forgiveness and need to learn it, or we aren’t actually required to forgive an unaccountable, unrepentant offender.

My problem here is I’m not sure which of the three is the truth.

One thing worth noting is that you are using one English word to cover two different Greek words:

"Forgive us our debts" (Lord's prayer, Strong's Greek word 863) is more related to "leaving" (e.g. Matthew 4:20 they "forgave" their fishing nets and followed Jesus).

"Forgiving one another, just as God in Christ forgave you" (Ephesians 4:32, Strong's Greek word 5483) is more akin to giving/granting (e.g. Luke 7:21 he "forgave" [granted] sight unto many that were blind)

Surely this won't resolve all of the confusion, but you have conflated two similar concepts.

[–] 0 pt

Thanks for the information. It would seem that the word could be used interchangeably within context: one meaning to repent (the "leave/leaving" version of the word) and one meaning what we're more familiar with (the version meaning to give/grant), which sounds more like "forgiveness" as we would usually understand it.

While that's interesting and good to know, you're right.. it's beside the point and doesn't really answer the question I'm asking.

The question isn't really well-formed because of the confusion. How we are to love each other (John 17, Ephesians 4) isn't the same as we are to love the lost.