Just because someone may or may not have flaws, doesn't mean they deserve eternal torture aka Hell. That's a demented psychopath's idea of justice.
may or may not
Well which is it?
have flaws
Is that all it is? You sound like my ex wife, describing her terrible behavior in the most favorable light.
deserve
If you are "flawed", why do you get to decide who deserves what?
eternal torture
Your words, not mine. Do you agree that how we live determines - even to the smallest degree - what happens when/after we die?
a demented psychopath's idea of justice
Not granting your foundation, but you do realize that the type of being usually associated with what your talking about is HOLY, i.e. totally unlike anything you or I have experienced on earth.
>You sound like my ex wife, describing her terrible behavior in the most favorable light.
Sounds like a you problem.
>eternal torture. Your words, not mine. Do you agree that how we live determines - even to the smallest degree - what happens when/after we die?
Aren't you a christian? That's what most Christians believe. Don't play dumb. Of course how you live determines your Karma and where you will go after you die, that's why I believe in Virtue. Ayurveda invented Morality, there's no Golden Rule without it.
On what was the existence of the first person with karma based? I picture it as some sort of cosmic moral balance.
So the first man is born with a lot in life, with circumstances that you would describe as...
actually never mind. You are a waste of time. I wrote out a whole thing and your only response was "sounds like a you problem."
You cannot engage at all in any serious discussion. Good luck. There is a moral code, and you can't unbreak the glass you've broken. You deserve death and are in no position to criticize the one who makes the rules.
(post is archived)