Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

269

Not that the Bible is wrong at all, but where does one draw the line between believing in God existing, and believing that the contents of the Bible are never corrupted? What would even stop one from not corrupting the Bible, especially given that everything else in our lives is corrupt? If I remember, some of the content of the Bible was literally added on later when KJV came out by one dude, from England, so who is to say divine inspiration wasn't used in other parts for either population control, personal beliefs or whoever knows what else?

Not that the Bible is wrong at all, but where does one draw the line between believing in God existing, and believing that the contents of the Bible are never corrupted? What would even stop one from not corrupting the Bible, especially given that everything else in our lives is corrupt? If I remember, some of the content of the Bible was literally added on later when KJV came out by one dude, from England, so who is to say divine inspiration wasn't used in other parts for either population control, personal beliefs or whoever knows what else?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (18).
[–] • 0 pt

Some old southern churches are that way. I find the older folk go to love Jesus and God but a many have ruined tradition and destroyed and changed the word. The japs say Jesus didn't die his brother did and he died at 106 years old in Japan and is buried there The Nepalese believe his name was Issa and he traveled to Nepal and India to train before going ho.e to Palestine and being crucified