![Stand Together In The Face Of Evil [500x558 - 100KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/WGnnkO.jpg){kind=link}
What was the religion of your ancestors? I mean those same ancestors who fought through the dark ages up until the second world war and imposed their civilizational model on the rest of the world?
I mean you realize that islam lost to modernity something like 2 centuries ago, right? You do realize that islam has serious problems? And that the only reason it's still around is because some muslims happen to be sitting on natural resources?
You know what muslims countries contribute to global GDP? https://corporatemaldives.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/world-economy-gdp-1.jpg
Talking about fucking useless eaters... And you realize that there are something like 2 billion muslims? 24% of global population? And they contribute 7% to the global GDP?
Those people are a fucking civilizational failure, imagine what it would be like for them without fossil fuel revenues
>Like china? Would they built up their infrastructure, welcome them in, have women hold up "refugees welcome" signs, cover up child rape by foreigners?
You're talking about shitlibs, fucking 20 something green haired atheist lesbians and cucks for the most part
Perhaps we should've taken their natural ressources away.
But that would require an ideology that is not afraid of having imperialistic ambitions, nor too timid to make use of violence against people who are basically the "underdog". As you point out they are backwards and weaker than us. It would require an ideology that roots for Goliath, not (((David))).
Same with shitlibs. It's not socially acceptable to be violent against someone who is weaker. Can't hit women. Can't hit a soycuck if you visit a gym more often than him. You are goliath, they are (((David))).
Will you root for the strong, or would you rather see the meek and underdogs rule?
>Will you root for the strong, or would you rather see the meek and underdogs rule?
That's a loaded question... Don't do it again
I root for the most qualified, always, and that's not necessarily the biggest grunt. In fact it's rarely the biggest grunt. Take the vietnam conflict during the 70s the big grunt wasn't exactly the most appropriate option in that environment. Granted he can carry the machine gun and that helps, but at the same time he's a big ass target moving slow and a grenade magnet... Needless to mention tunels, at that point he's useless he can't enter, too big, you need a tunnel rat/mexican type of guy, with a colt
And the big grunt shits big, eats big, drinks big, is big, and makes noise. And he can also turn out to be the bigger pussy when bullets start flying
So you see, context matters, a lot. And so do individuals. So when it comes to managing an empire...
Yes, I agree. I don't mean strong as in purely physical.
Perhaps a silly example, but:
Napoleons height was 1.68m.
Putins height is 1.7m
Obamas height is 1.87m.
If I had to pick a strong leader to root for, it wouldn't be mister "you didn't built that" .
(post is archived)