Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

853

So the first angel went and poured out his bowl on the earth and loathsome and malignant sores broke out on those who who had the mark of the beast and worshiped it's image. rev 16:2

i've heard a lot of talk recently about the jab giving people aids. not the type from hiv but still a problem with the immune system, and that made me think about kaposi's sarcoma which a lot of aids patients have and how that might qualify as loathesome and malignant sores.

i'm still not really sure if i believe the jab is the mark of the beast, but it definantly is worth considering.

So the first angel went and poured out his bowl on the earth and loathsome and malignant sores broke out on those who who had the mark of the beast and worshiped it's image. rev 16:2 i've heard a lot of talk recently about the jab giving people aids. not the type from hiv but still a problem with the immune system, and that made me think about kaposi's sarcoma which a lot of aids patients have and how that might qualify as loathesome and malignant sores. i'm still not really sure if i believe the jab is the mark of the beast, but it definantly is worth considering.

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

Forehead or Hand, Dog. But this is definitely foreshadowing. Its easy to see the geist over the vaccine and "medical health" controlling people who are 110% for it and for pushing it on everyone around them. These people will absolutely willingly take the the Mark of the Beast when its rolled out down the road. The division of people who will and who wont is very clearly drawn.

[–] • 4 pts

In the hand and forehead not on(or at least depending on what translation you are reading) seeming to imply what you do and think rather than a physical mark. Could be something as simple as choosing "science" over God.

Revelation 13:16-18 - And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads

But, like I said before I'm not convinced either way... I just found this concept interesting.

[–] • 2 pts

I would think that the concept of "thought and deed" would more or less count the same as receiving a physical mark, just like the bible says hating someone enough to kill them is the same as murdering them in action.

[–] • 0 pt

Could be something as simple as choosing "science" over God.

You don't have to choose science over God:

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

They were to have the law written on their hands and their foreheads (see "phylactery"). Could be related.

[–] • 2 pts
[–] • 0 pt

I think that the false/sunday sabbath has to be the mark, but I think that the ‘snake bite’ could well be part of the mark/name/number package or as says a foreshadowing.

Dr Pidgeon makes a really strong case for it being the mark though:

COVID-19 vaccine and the Mark of the Beast https://www.cepher.net/blog.aspx?post=7742&title=On-the-Mark-of-the-Beast

[–] • 1 pt

Everyone who worships "science" has gotten the jab... So perhaps it isn't the mark, but the bowl?

[–] • 0 pt

I favour the historicist analysis that the first vial/bowl was the French revolution, but I don’t rule out multiple or compound fulfillments.

[–] • 1 pt

Never heard this. Any digs?