I mean no disrespect, but you don't seem to be understanding what I'm trying to express. The fault may be mine in being unclear. What I am doing is differentiating between "the Jews" as the contemporary group we know today, and the Hebrews living under the Old Covenant. I am absolutely *not* denying that Jews today reject Christ, that their vile Talmud blaspheme Him, that their very revolutionary and subversive identity is interwoven with their rejection of the Divine Logos, our Savior. I affirm all of this. What I am saying is that the Old Testament Hebrews did not as a totality reject Jesus Christ, because the Logos *had not yet become Incarnate*. In other words, under the Old Law they were still *rightfully* awaiting the Messiah; there was no Messiah to reject. Because this is the case, and because I view the particularly unique *subversive* nature of the Jews as a *result* of rejecting Christ, then I believe we must distinguish categorically between the Old Testsment Jews, and those Jews living under the New Testsment who, by remaining Jews, have forsaken the Christ.