Reading your article does cause one to question the understanding of one's faith. To include, does cause one to question one's "knowledge" or understanding of "The Word". Written decent - with inconsistencies in grammar and punctuation - but conveyed with such conviction, it is hard to deny something unusual, something mysterious; A salmon swimming against the current. Subsisting, the denial of the exquisite expression - which can be interpreted as the "Holy Spirit" existing in your real conviction - by some, one can inevitably conclude, must be a laugh, to those - like yourself - who are stripped of any opposition to their faith. However, it is hard to believe that one can stand naked and unashamed, which draws a question to mind: Was it Adam's and Eve's personal conviction of knowing that which was right to do and yet they did not do so, deliberately defying the law of God not to eat of that fruit, that conveyed to their contentiousness that they were naked? This question is only imposed for the purposes that in reading the "word" for ones' self one can clearly see that no one told them they were naked. Which can draw a clear second question; Why did God ask who conveyed to them their nakedness in the specifics of "who", when no one told them?