Two years after Scofield’s reported conversion to Christianity in 1879, the Atchison Patriot was less than impressed. Describing the former Atchison resident as the “late lawyer, politician and shyster generally,” the article went on to recount a few of Scofield’s “many malicious acts.” These included a series of forgeries in St. Louis, for which he was sentenced to six months in jail.
Being a “born again” preacher did not preclude Scofield from becoming a member of an exclusive New York men’s club in 1901, either. In his devastating biography, The Incredible Scofield and His Book, Joseph M. Canfield suggests, “The admission of Scofield to the Lotus Club, which could not have been sought by Scofield, strengthens the suspicion that has cropped up before, that someone was directing the career of C.I. Scofield.”
That someone, Canfield suspects, was associated with one of the club’s committee members, the Wall Street lawyer Samuel Untermeyer. As Canfield intimates, Scofield’s theology was “most helpful in getting Fundamentalist Christians to back the international interest in one of Untermeyer’s pet projects—the Zionist Movement.”
This is becoming a troll to propagate the information you deem necessary, and is taking away from the purpose of this particular room's subject matter.
Oh that's a troll now
You can't handle information sharing, let alone the truth
And that's a fucking fact, now what?
I mean not to insult you, but I do to intend to respect the integrity of one's post, and purpose of one's room. Perhaps if you share this information in the proper room, such as one that is intended for such revelation based information, that you'd like to put forth, it would be more then enlightening to dive knee deep into this information which is quite obvious in most areas. The appreciation from one - to you - who has the desire to wake one up according to your convictions is more understood then you know. But a man only seeks the influence of the intended purpose of the topic of the room, which was a question initiated toward the viewer/reader of such, "What does the Bible say about the Sabbath? Let's see..." Attached is an article that leads to the opposite of the article which you tried quoting outside of the written article that captivated my interest in the first place. What you have given is yesterdays factual hidden news, which offers no more revelation then one has discovered fifty years ago; No punt intended.
(post is archived)